On Jul 30, 2006, at 7:22 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Oh, did I mention we're looking to use a flattened device tree?
That way
we can omit the OF client interface firmware code we currently
load into
domUs. (We could still supply a client interface for other OSs in the
future, if needed, a
Oh, did I mention we're looking to use a flattened device tree?
That way
we can omit the OF client interface firmware code we currently load
into
domUs. (We could still supply a client interface for other OSs in the
future, if needed, and that code would interpret the flattened tree
itself.)
On Jul 28, 2006, at 6:07 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
As a very brief recap, we're looking at how best to construct the
device
tree when constructing a new DomU.
At the Xen minisummit in Ottawa, Ewan recommended constructing the
device tree in python, since the xend level of the tools has acce
I think I have all our trees sorted now (and we should be all up-to-date
again), so I've been working on device tree construction again...
As a very brief recap, we're looking at how best to construct the device
tree when constructing a new DomU.
At the Xen minisummit in Ottawa, Ewan recommended
