On 26/2/07 23:31, Hollis Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Yamahata-san, thanks very much for your patch!
I'm confused about one thing though: why do we need to take a lock to
read d-grant_table-nr_grant_frames? It's a simple integer, so no lock
is required or useful.
I haven't got
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 23:39 +, Keir Fraser wrote:
On 26/2/07 23:31, Hollis Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Yamahata-san, thanks very much for your patch!
I'm confused about one thing though: why do we need to take a lock to
read d-grant_table-nr_grant_frames? It's a simple
On 27/2/07 00:05, Hollis Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't believe that's a concern, since updating
grant_table-nr_grant_frames is the very last step in
gnttab_grow_table(), and it will only grow.
If there's a memory barrier before the update of nr_grant_frames, explicitly
or
Attached the updated patches. Please find them
- 13985_4fa9b86d41b8_grow_granttable_acm.patch
acm part. I did only compile test.
- 13986_cca098fd122c_grow_granttable_ia64.patch
ia64 part.
- 13987_f5f232aef7bd_grow_granttable_powerpc.patch
powerpc part. This patch
