Re: [XenPPC] [PATCH] Fix Maple SMP spurious interrupts assert

2006-10-13 Thread Jimi Xenidis
I am not familiar with SMP spurious interrupts assert panic(Too many (%d) spurrious interrupts in a row\n Known problem, please halt and let machine idle/ cool then reboot\n, 100); message? That is independent of SMP, we get

Re: [XenPPC] [PATCH] Fix Maple SMP spurious interrupts assert

2006-10-12 Thread Jimi Xenidis
On Oct 11, 2006, at 8:05 PM, Amos Waterland wrote: This lets Xen with the SMP patch boot reliably on the Maple-D platform I have access to. I believe that the long-term strategy for Xen/PPC is to completely virtualize the PIC, but until that happens, this patch will I believe allow the SMP