Scratch this! I do not think this entry is for the devtree, I think
it is the bogus entry that we create to optionally reserve the memory
for the initrd, this was a side effect of creating the devtree in the
python tree.
So now that its in libxc we can clean it up. We must have made it
red
On Jan 16, 2007, at 10:05 AM, Ryan Harper wrote:
* Hollis Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-15 20:44]:
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 21:29 -0500, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
On Jan 15, 2007, at 8:20 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 17:25 -0500, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
+int make_devtree(
* Hollis Blanchard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-15 20:44]:
> On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 21:29 -0500, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
> > On Jan 15, 2007, at 8:20 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 17:25 -0500, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
> > > +int make_devtree(
> > >> [snip]
> > Any ideas
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 21:29 -0500, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2007, at 8:20 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 17:25 -0500, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
> > +int make_devtree(
> >> [snip]
> Any ideas what this reservation is for? is it for the flat-devtree
> itself?
On Jan 15, 2007, at 8:20 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 17:25 -0500, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
+int make_devtree(
[snip]
Any ideas what this reservation is for? is it for the flat-devtree
itself?
Nope.
+/* root.reserve(0x100, 0x1000) */
+val[0] = cpu_to_be64((u64
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 17:25 -0500, Jimi Xenidis wrote:
> >>> +int make_devtree(
> [snip]
> >> Any ideas what this reservation is for? is it for the flat-devtree
> >> itself?
> >
> > Nope.
> >
> >>> +/* root.reserve(0x100, 0x1000) */
> >>> +val[0] = cpu_to_be64((u64) 0x100);
> >>> +
On Jan 15, 2007, at 4:13 PM, Ryan Harper wrote:
* Jimi Xenidis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-15 14:53]:
On Jan 15, 2007, at 1:51 PM, Ryan Harper wrote:
* Jimi Xenidis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-11 16:53]:
[snip]
- renamed find_first_cpu to find_cpu, we don't care which cpu we
find
I b
* Jimi Xenidis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-15 14:53]:
>
> On Jan 15, 2007, at 1:51 PM, Ryan Harper wrote:
>
> >* Jimi Xenidis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-11 16:53]:
> >>
> >>Ok there are a few things here.
> >
> BTW: some of these issues existed in the original python, but they
> are yours now
On Jan 15, 2007, at 1:51 PM, Ryan Harper wrote:
* Jimi Xenidis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-11 16:53]:
Ok there are a few things here.
BTW: some of these issues existed in the original python, but they
are yours now :)
Respun with fixes:
- preserve and return errno where approriate
-
* Jimi Xenidis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-11 16:53]:
>
> Ok there are a few things here.
Respun with fixes:
- preserve and return errno where approriate
- using open/close and read/write instead of f*
- dropped vcpu argument, only fill out one cpu in devtree
- dropped regexp requirment, use a
* Jimi Xenidis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-11 16:53]:
>
> Ok there are a few things here.
Thanks for looking this over.
And just to give you the context for the code, I was attempted to
directly port the code from FlatDeviceTree.py.
> On Jan 11, 2007, at 1:42 PM, Ryan Harper wrote:
> >+
> >+
Ok there are a few things here.
On Jan 11, 2007, at 1:42 PM, Ryan Harper wrote:
7 files changed, 617 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
tools/libxc/powerpc64/Makefile |1
tools/libxc/powerpc64/mk_flatdevtree.c | 520 ++
++
tools/libxc/powerpc64/mk_flatdevtr
12 matches
Mail list logo
