Re: [XenPPC] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/6][TOOLS][XM-TEST] [v2] Update xm-test to support new architectures

2006-10-03 Thread Ewan Mellor
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 10:20:36AM -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote: On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 13:23 +0100, Ewan Mellor wrote: On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 03:57:26PM +0800, Tony Breeds wrote: Hi All, These patches update the xm-test code to be more easily portable to new architecture. This

Re: [XenPPC] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/6][TOOLS][XM-TEST] [v2] Update xm-test to support new architectures

2006-10-03 Thread Hollis Blanchard
On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 16:30 +0100, Ewan Mellor wrote: Ewan, if you have some problem with patch 1/6, could you still apply the rest to xen-unstable? 2/6 wouldn't apply cleanly, but should be easy to do by hand. I've got no particular problem with these patches (we'll host the

Re: [XenPPC] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/6][TOOLS][XM-TEST] [v2] Update xm-test to support new architectures

2006-10-03 Thread Keir Fraser
On 3/10/06 16:53, Hollis Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've got no particular problem with these patches (we'll host the buildroot tar on xenbits, which was the only query). The tree's feature-frozen now though -- we're at RC2 -- so these will drop in immediately after the release.

Re: [XenPPC] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/6][TOOLS][XM-TEST] [v2] Update xm-test to support new architectures

2006-10-03 Thread Aron Griffis
Keir Fraser wrote: [Tue Oct 03 2006, 11:59:28AM EDT] Xen-unstable is currently a staging tree for xen-3.0.3-testing. Development is frozen until 3.0.3-0 is released. Hi Keir, Why are you doing it this way? I thought a staging tree was somewhere you could test builds prior to moving