On 3/10/06 17:39, "Aron Griffis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Keir Fraser wrote: [Tue Oct 03 2006, 11:59:28AM EDT]
>> Xen-unstable is currently a staging tree for xen-3.0.3-testing. Development
>> is frozen until 3.0.3-0 is released.
>
> Hi Keir,
>
> Why are you doing it this way? I thought a
Keir Fraser wrote: [Tue Oct 03 2006, 11:59:28AM EDT]
> Xen-unstable is currently a staging tree for xen-3.0.3-testing. Development
> is frozen until 3.0.3-0 is released.
Hi Keir,
Why are you doing it this way? I thought a staging tree was somewhere
you could test builds prior to moving changese
On 3/10/06 16:53, "Hollis Blanchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've got no particular problem with these patches (we'll host the
>> buildroot tar on xenbits, which was the only query). The tree's
>> feature-frozen now though -- we're at RC2 -- so these will drop in
>> immediately after the re
On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 16:30 +0100, Ewan Mellor wrote:
>
> > Ewan, if you have some problem with patch 1/6, could you still apply
> the
> > rest to xen-unstable? 2/6 wouldn't apply cleanly, but should be easy
> to
> > do by hand.
>
> I've got no particular problem with these patches (we'll host th
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 10:20:36AM -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 13:23 +0100, Ewan Mellor wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 03:57:26PM +0800, Tony Breeds wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > > These patches update the xm-test code to be more easily portable
> > > to new archit
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 13:23 +0100, Ewan Mellor wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 03:57:26PM +0800, Tony Breeds wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> > These patches update the xm-test code to be more easily portable
> > to new architecture. This focus of this endeavor is PPC but I believe
> > that IA64 also b
