On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 03:38:09PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 10:10 -0500, W. Michael Petullo wrote:
> > >> There are known bugs in FC15/FC16 that have been filled some time ago
> > >> that
> > >> folks will sadly run into: 728775, 658387 and 668063
> > >>
> > >> Fortu
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:14:23PM +0300, Myroslav Opyr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What Xen implementation is considered "supported" for FC16 DomU?
Any commonly available upstream Xen releases.
Fedora itself
(ie. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XenPvopsDom0).
Also Xen in RHEL 5, although that's m
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:08:40PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:14:23PM +0300, Myroslav Opyr wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > What Xen implementation is considered "supported" for FC16 DomU?
>
> Any commonly available upstream Xen releases.
>
> Fedora itself
> (ie. https:/
> Testing out myoung's 3.1.0 was not as straight forward as I had hoped. It did
> boot up without any BUG:s, but I did get the occasional Lock Order message.
> Log snippet at the end of the post. It doesn't seem to be directly related to
> starting guests.
Yeah, those look like the network card
