On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 06:59:57PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 03:46:31PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > On 09/21/2011 01:03 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > So, there's a meta-point here: we currently 'require' Beta releases to
> > boot as gue
Bob Cochran wrote:
>
>
> On 9/21/11 9:35 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>> Bob Cochran wrote:
>>> I want to build a new computer system that features dual processors, a
>>> lot of memory, and is able to run Xen virtualization. Install Fedora
>>> and
>>> Xen as the host on such a machine, and then start
>>
>> On 9/21/11 9:35 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>>> Bob Cochran wrote:
I want to build a new computer system that features dual processors, a
lot of memory, and is able to run Xen virtualization. Install
Fedora and
Xen as the host on such a machine, and then start running a var
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 03:08:41PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:47:57PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 06:59:57PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 03:46:31PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > > > On
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:47:57PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 06:59:57PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 03:46:31PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > > On 09/21/2011 01:03 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > So, there's a meta
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 04:03:49PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > >> So, there's a meta-point here: we currently 'require' Beta releases to
> > >> boot as guests on Xen hosts:
> > >>
> > >> "The release must boot successfully as a virtual guest in a situation
> > >> where the virtual host