Re: [Fedora-xen] dom0 kernel and xen hypervisor

2010-06-01 Thread Virgil
-64.so.2' -> `': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `libdl.so.2' -> `': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `libattr.so.1' -> `': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `libc.so.6' -> `': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `ld-linux-x86-64.so.2' -> `': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `libacl.so.1' -> `': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `libattr.so.1' -> `': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `libc.so.6' -> `': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `libdl.so.2' -> `': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `ld-linux-x86-64.so.2' -> `': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `libacl.so.1' -> `': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `libattr.so.1' -> `': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `libc.so.6' -> `': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `libdl.so.2' -> `': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `ld-linux-x86-64.so.2' -> `': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `libc.so.6' -> `': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `ld-linux-x86-64.so.2' -> `': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `libc.so.6' -> `': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `ld-linux-x86-64.so.2' -> `': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `libc.so.6' -> `': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `ld-linux-x86-64.so.2' -> `': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `libc.so.6' -> `': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `ld-linux-x86-64.so.2' -> `': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `libc.so.6' -> `': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `libdl.so.2' -> `': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `ld-linux-x86-64.so.2' -> `': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `libtinfo.so.5' -> `': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `libpcre.so.0' -> `': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `libc.so.6' -> `': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `ld-linux-x86-64.so.2' -> `': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `libc.so.6' -> `': No such file or directory ln: creating symbolic link `ld-linux-x86-64.so.2' -> `': No such file or directory ldconfig: Cannot mmap file /lib64/libdmraid-events-isw.so. ldconfig: Cannot mmap file /lib64/libnss_files.so.2. /sbin/dracut: line 307: : No such file or directory E: dracut: creation of failed mkinitrd failed warning: %post(kernel-2.6.32.14-1.2.105.xendom0.fc12.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 1 Cheers Virgil. -- xen mailing list xen@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen

[Fedora-xen] Xen 4.0.0

2010-06-01 Thread Virgil
unpackaged) file(s) found: /etc/hotplug/xen-backend.agent RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /etc/hotplug/xen-backend.agent The question is: Does this matter? Can I just ignore it and use the RPM anyway? Cheers Virgil. -- xen mailing list xen@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: [Fedora-xen] Xen 4.0.0

2010-06-02 Thread Virgil
On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 05:34:34 am M A Young wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Virgil wrote: > > Just doing an rpmbuild on: > > > > xen-4.0.0-0.7.fc12.x86_64 > > > > and I get this error towards the end: > > > > Processing files: xen-debuginfo-4.0.0-0.7.f

Re: [Fedora-xen] Xen 4.0.0

2010-06-03 Thread Virgil
Further testing (haven't done the extra recommended things yet). xendom0-105/xen-3.9.3 Success. This works but hardware virtualization exhibits the same issues with WinXP as the xendom0-97/xen-4.0.0 combo. The configs are identical except that qemu-dm is in /usr/lib64/xen/bin whereas with xen-4.

Re: [Fedora-xen] Xen 4.0.0

2010-06-03 Thread Virgil
8005003b cr4: 06d0 (XEN) cr3: 015a9000 cr2: b1b60000 (XEN) ds: 007b es: 007b fs: 00d8 gs: 00e0 ss: 0068 cs: 0060 On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 04:59:12 pm you wrote: > On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 02:23:15PM +1000, Virgil wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Jun 2010 05

Re: [Fedora-xen] Xen 4.0.0

2010-06-03 Thread Virgil
memsize=maxmem and target=memory. If these the same, the internal function will not use PoD. Trying this now. Success!! The 32hv12 machine is alive and kicking!!! Just set MAXMEM=MEMORY and PoD is disabled!! Very happy here. Now for WinXP. Cheers V On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 10:53:40 am Virgil wrote

Re: [Fedora-xen] Xen 4.0.0

2010-06-03 Thread Virgil
Success! xendom0-105/xen-3.4.3 combo. PoD memory disabled and WinXP Pro installed and operational. On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 02:03:26 pm Virgil wrote: > Is this what is happening?: > > http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2008-12/msg01030.html > > i.e. the guest does not

Re: [Fedora-xen] xen 3.4.3 SRPM

2010-06-17 Thread Virgil
On Sat, 29 May 2010 11:26:50 pm M A Young wrote: > If anyone wants to test xen 3.4.3, I have put up a source RPM at > http://myoung.fedorapeople.org/dom0/src/xen-3.4.3-0.91.fc13.src.rpm > > Michael Young > > -- > xen mailing list > xen@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.o

Re: [Fedora-xen] xen 3.4.3 SRPM

2010-06-20 Thread Virgil
Just a quick update: Just tried xen-4.0.0-2. Recompile from source on fc12.x86_64. identical behaviour. Cheers V On Fri, 18 Jun 2010 03:17:19 pm Virgil wrote: > On Sat, 29 May 2010 11:26:50 pm M A Young wrote: > > If anyone wants to test xen 3.4.3, I have put up a source RPM at

Re: [Fedora-xen] xen 3.4.3 SRPM

2010-06-20 Thread Virgil
is to add an n-millisecond delay every time the output stream in Xen sees a \n. This would delay the screen updates enough for the camera to see them. The n should be configurable on the kernel boot command line. It's set to 0 right now. Cheers V On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 12:10:17 pm Virgil wrote

Re: [Fedora-xen] xen 3.4.3 SRPM

2010-06-21 Thread Virgil
Hi Pasi, On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 08:57:55 pm Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 01:56:36PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 02:28:15PM +1000, Virgil wrote: > > > Another quick update > > > > > > xen-4.0.1-0.1.rc3.fc13.s

Re: [Fedora-xen] xen 3.4.3 SRPM

2010-06-22 Thread Virgil
xt this buffer overflow causes the RTC to hangup somehow. I pressed the reset button, but this time the 2 64PV machines are not logged in. I'll just let it go and see if it keeps going. Cheers V On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 04:29:06 pm Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at

Re: [Fedora-xen] xen 3.4.3 SRPM / console problem

2010-06-23 Thread Virgil
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 03:30:52 pm Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:11:58AM +1000, Virgil wrote: > > Hi Pasi, > > > > Had a hiccup overnite: > > > > The host became unresponsive in a weird way. The time stopped > > incrementing. > > &

Re: [Fedora-xen] xen 3.4.3 SRPM / console problem

2010-06-23 Thread Virgil
p.s. FYI Samba4-Alpha12 Active Directory controller is working well on 64PVFC12. On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 05:18:56 pm Virgil wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 03:30:52 pm Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:11:58AM +1000, Virgil wrote: > > > Hi Pasi, > &

Re: [Fedora-xen] xen 3.4.3 SRPM / console problem

2010-06-30 Thread Virgil
Update: Completely stable with 7 VMs. Hasn't missed a beat for several days now. Will now run the pings again in 2 of 64PV from the virtual consoles (no graphics - and disconnected) and see if the host clock tick dies again. Cheers V On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 03:17:51 pm Virgil wrote: &g

Re: [Fedora-xen] xen 3.4.3 SRPM / console problem

2010-07-11 Thread Virgil
ched on for that long :-) Cheers V On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 09:25:48 am Virgil wrote: > Update: > > Completely stable with 7 VMs. Hasn't missed a beat for several days now. > > Will now run the pings again in 2 of 64PV from the virtual consoles (no > graphics - and disconnected)

Re: [Fedora-xen] xen 4.0.1-rc4

2010-07-27 Thread Virgil
Host lockup. Hi Guys, disaster after starting a WindowsXP Pro HVM. Came back this morning to find a dead host. Here's the output from the XEN serial port relating to the 3 domU's running. 2 are running Fedora 12 and 13. These had been running for 4 days prior to starting the WinXP machine. (X

Re: [Fedora-xen] xen 4.0.1-rc6

2010-08-15 Thread Virgil
FYI Stability with: Linux seanl64. 2.6.32.17-157.xendom0.fc12.x86_64 #1 SMP Sat Aug 7 15:26:59 UTC 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux kernel-devel-2.6.32.17-157.xendom0.fc12.x86_64 kernel-2.6.32.17-157.xendom0.fc12.x86_64 kernel-firmware-2.6.32.17-157.xendom0.fc12.noarch kernel-headers-2

Re: [Fedora-xen] xen and dom0 kernel builds

2010-09-26 Thread Virgil
Sep 20 19:32:37 UTC 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Cheers Virgil On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 08:02:00 am M A Young wrote: > I have built a new kernel (kernel-2.6.32.21-168.xendom0.fc12) at > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2477887 or at the > reposi

Re: [Fedora-xen] xen and dom0 kernel builds

2010-09-26 Thread Virgil
Further to the previous email regarding diskio stats: It appears the ksysguardd is no longer able to gather stats either. I'm suspecting a bug in the kernel and not libvirtd. Cheers V On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 08:02:00 am M A Young wrote: > I have built a new kernel (kernel-2.6.32.21-168.xendom0.fc12

Re: [Fedora-xen] another xen build

2010-10-17 Thread Virgil
xen-4.0.1-6.fc12 (recompiled under FC12) likewise seems to resolve all issues here. Fingers crossed, so far so good. Cheers V On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 10:32:12 pm Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 04:32:20PM +0100, M A Young wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Oct 2010, M A Young wrote: > > > On Wed

Re: [Fedora-xen] another xen kernel

2010-10-25 Thread Virgil
kernel-2.6.32.25-171.rc1.xendom0.fc12 RTC went mad. 1 sec = 1mS Top was showing hours whizzing past in minutes. Windows VM went crazy doing stuff. FC13 VM went crazy too doing all sorts of things really quickly. Bizzare effect. Went back to -168 kernel. Alls well again. Cheers V96 On Sun, 24

Re: [Fedora-xen] 2.6.32.x dom0 kernel

2010-11-09 Thread Virgil
(Xen) Platform timer appears to have unexpectedly wrapped 10 or more times Kaboom! Zz. 2.6.32.25-172.xendom0.fc12 FC14 everything else. Cheers V On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 07:43:36 am M A Young wrote: > I have built another 2.6.32.x based kernel (2.6.32.25-172.xendom0.fc12) at > http://koji.fe

Re: [Fedora-xen] 2.6.32.x dom0 kernel

2010-11-16 Thread Virgil
Host crashed. Running HVM fc14-32. Skipping 86000 seconds. Skipping 86000 seconds. Skipping 86000 seconds. Skipping 86000 seconds. Skipping 86000 seconds. Skipping 86000 seconds. Skipping 86000 seconds. ... ... ... ... Kaboom Cheers V On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 07:43:36 am M A Young wrote: > I have buil

Re: [Fedora-xen] 2.6.32.x dom0 kernel

2010-12-12 Thread Virgil
Found this in /var/log/messages as the last thing prior to death. Clocksource tsc unstable Did some Googling and found some people changed the dom0 clocksource. Added clocksource=jiffies to the kernel commandline. Will see if it does anything. V On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 12:00:01 pm Virgil

Re: [Fedora-xen] 2.6.32.x dom0 kernel

2010-12-14 Thread Virgil
gt; On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:30:35AM +1100, Virgil wrote: > > Found this in /var/log/messages as the last thing prior to death. > > > > Clocksource tsc unstable > > > > Did some Googling and found some people changed the dom0 clocksource. > > > >

Re: [Fedora-xen] 2.6.32.x dom0 kernel

2010-12-23 Thread Virgil
Just a quick pre-xmas report: Since turning off all power saving in the BIOS, everything has worked flawlessly (now that I've emailed this I'm sure the entire system will blow up). So far so good. Cheers and merry Xmas V. On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 01:56:31 pm Virgil wrote: > Hi

Re: [Fedora-xen] 2.6.32.x dom0 kernel

2011-02-22 Thread Virgil
Feb 23rd here in Australia. The system is still running flawlessly since turning off all power saving in the BIOS. Looks like the power saving stuff in the BIOS for AMD processors could be the issue with the clocksource. Cheers V On Fri, 24 Dec 2010 02:10:54 pm Virgil wrote: > Just a qu

Re: [Fedora-xen] 2.6.32 dom0 kernel

2011-05-18 Thread Virgil
Just did: rpm -Uvh --oldpackage * The upgrade deleted all previous kernels (/lib/modules and all) on the F14 test box. It got the grub.conf wrong (we're booting off raid). Manually fixed the grub.conf and life goes on. Cheers V. On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 07:57:05 AM M A Young wrote: > I have b

Re: [Fedora-xen] fedora 16 with xen balloning.

2011-09-30 Thread Virgil
AAAhhhh Noun: BALLOON! Verb: BALLOONING! V On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 08:56:28 AM Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 08:03:37PM -0300, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 7:59 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > > > > wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 0

[Fedora-xen] DomU nat router fails when DomUs on same host

2012-03-12 Thread Virgil
tat -ant' Only nat'd tcp connections are effected. Connections to machines on the same bridge work fine. Does this sound familiar to anyone? Thanks in advance Virgil -- xen mailing list xen@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen

[Fedora-xen] mdadm fails to start raid in pv fc16 DomU on old host

2012-03-18 Thread Virgil
I'm having a problem with mdraid running in a DomU. The issue is that mdraid declares one leg of the raid to have failed (when there's actually nothing wrong). DomU is fc16 - 3.2.2-1.fc16.x86_64 Dom0 is fc14 - 2.6.32.26-174.2.xendom0.fc12.x86_64 The same DomU running on Dom0 fc16 - 3.2.7-1.fc16

Re: [Fedora-xen] mdadm fails to start raid in pv fc16 DomU on old host

2012-03-28 Thread Virgil
make it easy to install via rpm (assuming it can compile). On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 01:17:49 PM Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 01:35:19PM +1100, Virgil wrote: > > I'm having a problem with mdraid running in a DomU. The issue is that > > mdraid declares one l

Re: [Fedora-xen] mdadm fails to start raid in pv fc16 DomU on old host

2012-03-29 Thread Virgil
compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc ES1000 (rev 02) Thanks again. V On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 10:51:14 AM Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 01:38:38PM +1100, Virgil wrote: > > Hi Konrad, > > > > Firstly, thanks for the reply. > > > > What I&#x