On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 04:03:49PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > >> So, there's a meta-point here: we currently 'require' Beta releases to
> > >> boot as guests on Xen hosts:
> > >>
> > >> "The release must boot successfully as a virtual guest in a situation
> > >> where the virtual host
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:47:57PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 06:59:57PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 03:46:31PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > > On 09/21/2011 01:03 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > So, there's a meta
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 03:08:41PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:47:57PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 06:59:57PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 03:46:31PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > > > On
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 06:59:57PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 03:46:31PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > On 09/21/2011 01:03 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > So, there's a meta-point here: we currently 'require' Beta releases to
> > boot as gue
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 03:46:31PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 09/21/2011 01:03 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> So, there's a meta-point here: we currently 'require' Beta releases to
> boot as guests on Xen hosts:
>
> "The release must boot successfully as a virtua
On 09/21/2011 01:03 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
So, there's a meta-point here: we currently 'require' Beta releases to
boot as guests on Xen hosts:
"The release must boot successfully as a virtual guest in a situation
where the virtual host is running a supported Xen i
> >> So, there's a meta-point here: we currently 'require' Beta releases to
> >> boot as guests on Xen hosts:
> >>
> >> "The release must boot successfully as a virtual guest in a situation
> >> where the virtual host is running a supported Xen implementation"
> >>
> >> I really don't have much kno
On 09/16/2011 01:43 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 03:38:09PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 10:10 -0500, W. Michael Petullo wrote:
> There are known bugs in FC15/FC16 that have been filled some time ago that
> folks will sadly run into: 7
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:08:40PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:14:23PM +0300, Myroslav Opyr wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > What Xen implementation is considered "supported" for FC16 DomU?
>
> Any commonly available upstream Xen releases.
>
> Fedora itself
> (ie. https:/
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 05:45:39PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> >
> > > >([3]https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/219). It takes time
> > > > for us
> > > >to setup test environment, and would be good to have some info in
> > > > advance.
> >
Ok, so some basic steps to test Xen
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:25:23AM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 02:25:52PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 01:33:54AM +0300, Myroslav Opyr wrote:
> > >Hi,
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > >Virtualization Test day is expected to be on Septem
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 02:25:52PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 01:33:54AM +0300, Myroslav Opyr wrote:
> >Hi,
>
> Hello,
>
> >Virtualization Test day is expected to be on September 15th this year
> >([1]https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/232).
Cool.
12 matches
Mail list logo
