Re: [Fedora-xen] [xen-maint] Change xen package owner away from xen-maint?

2012-05-15 Thread Cole Robinson 
On 05/15/2012 02:25 PM, Cole Robinson wrote:
> On 05/15/2012 01:57 PM, M A Young wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 May 2012, Cole Robinson wrote:
>>
>>> Hey folks.
>>>
>>> Right now the package owner for xen in fedora is the xen-maint alias 
>>> account.
>>> Originally this was an alias that was mapped to various @redhat folks who 
>>> were
>>> doing xen development, and was used for both fedora and internal RHEL stuff.
>>>
>>> Nowadays it's not really used in upstream/fedora land and fedora-virt-maint 
>>> is
>>> a better suited alias. Additionally @redhat isn't doing much xen work these
>>> days so we should just have a single package owner which reflects reality.
>>>
>>> So I propose we drop xen-maint as the package owner, and Michael can
>>> 'officially' take on package ownership. If that sounds fine I'll file a 
>>> ticket
>>> with fedora infrastructure to make the change (required AFAIK for alias
>>> account changes).
>>>
>>> Michael, does that sound good to you?
>>
>> Yes, it sounds good to me.
>>
>> Michael Young
> 
> Great, I filed an infrastructure ticket:
> 
> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/3291
> 

Resolved now, pkgdb lists myoung as the owner.

Thanks,
Cole

--
xen mailing list
xen@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen

Re: [Fedora-xen] [xen-maint] Change xen package owner away from xen-maint?

2012-05-15 Thread Don Dutile 

On 05/15/2012 11:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:

On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:24:52AM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:

Hey folks.

Right now the package owner for xen in fedora is the xen-maint alias account.
Originally this was an alias that was mapped to various @redhat folks who were
doing xen development, and was used for both fedora and internal RHEL stuff.

Nowadays it's not really used in upstream/fedora land and fedora-virt-maint is
a better suited alias. Additionally @redhat isn't doing much xen work these
days so we should just have a single package owner which reflects reality.

So I propose we drop xen-maint as the package owner, and Michael can
'officially' take on package ownership. If that sounds fine I'll file a ticket
with fedora infrastructure to make the change (required AFAIK for alias
account changes).


That sounds sensible to me


+1.  I thought Michael was already the (un?)official xen maintainer in Fedora!  
;-)



Daniel


--
xen mailing list
xen@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen