Re: [Xenomai] [PATCH] Fix compilation of e1000, eepro100 and igp rtnet drivers

2017-11-22 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
On 21/11/17 14:00, Norbert Lange wrote: > Hello, > > enabling RTNet will result in compile failures, because there is a > nameclash from some linux-headers. > This patch fixes some intel NICs to compile I have applied this patch and seems that works quiet well. Philippe, is this a correct

Re: [Xenomai] Updating from 3.0.5 to 3.0.6

2017-11-22 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
On 22/11/17 17:54, Philippe Gerum wrote: > On 11/22/2017 09:42 AM, Fazio Maurizio wrote: >> I have a stupid question… > > no prob. I'm still looking for smart answers. > >> I would like to upgrade my current xenomai 3.0.5 based system to xenomai >> 3.0.6… >> I need to repatch the kernel with

Re: [Xenomai] [RFC] RTnet, Analogy and the elephant in the room

2017-11-22 Thread Jan Kiszka
On 2017-11-21 18:11, Philippe Gerum wrote: > So, let's talk about the elephant in the room: the current situation of > the Xenomai project is not viable in the long run. I can only encourage > people who feel concerned about it to discuss openly the practical steps > to best address this

Re: [Xenomai] Updating from 3.0.5 to 3.0.6

2017-11-22 Thread Philippe Gerum
On 11/22/2017 09:42 AM, Fazio Maurizio wrote: > I have a stupid question… no prob. I'm still looking for smart answers. > I would like to upgrade my current xenomai 3.0.5 based system to xenomai > 3.0.6… > I need to repatch the kernel with the prepare-kernel script or I can only > rebuild and

Re: [Xenomai] [RFC] RTnet, Analogy and the elephant in the room

2017-11-22 Thread Steven Seeger
Philippe, as we have previously discussed I am willing to take over the PPC i- pipe maintenance on my personal time if it will help. My only issue is right now the only PPC board I have in my posseession is an 8548-based board. I might be able to borrow some 405 and 440-based boards from work if

Re: [Xenomai] Strange scheduling behaviour

2017-11-22 Thread Philippe Gerum
On 11/22/2017 05:10 PM, Cédric Perles wrote: > Hi, > > I’m working on an iMX6 based board with NXP kernel 4.1.15. Vendor kernels for i.MX6 are creepy (another vowel comes to mind). A recent mainline kernel is just fine if the SoC supports it. If not, porting the SoC (and/or missing driver) to

Re: [Xenomai] [RFC] RTnet, Analogy and the elephant in the room

2017-11-22 Thread Philippe Gerum
On 11/21/2017 08:54 PM, Dmitriy Cherkasov wrote: > On 11/21/2017 09:11 AM, Philippe Gerum wrote: > >> So, let's talk about the elephant in the room: the current situation of >> the Xenomai project is not viable in the long run. I can only encourage >> people who feel concerned about it to discuss

[Xenomai] Strange scheduling behaviour

2017-11-22 Thread Cédric Perles
Hi, I’m working on an iMX6 based board with NXP kernel 4.1.15. I would like to understand why latency max returned by cyclictest increases from 20µs to 100µs when dohell accesses to USB. Since i-pipe tracer refuses to work, I used ftrace to record cobalt, scheduling and irq events. Here is what

Re: [Xenomai] [RFC] RTnet, Analogy and the elephant in the room

2017-11-22 Thread Philippe Gerum
Hi Kendall, On 11/21/2017 08:27 PM, Auel, Kendall wrote: > Hi Philippe, > > Is there an online bug tracking and feature request database? This would be a > useful way to distribute work and to sync up contributors. I think the kernel > uses Bugzilla, and Ubuntu has Launchpad. No doubt there

Re: [Xenomai] [RFC] RTnet, Analogy and the elephant in the room

2017-11-22 Thread Philippe Gerum
On 11/21/2017 06:26 PM, Greg Gallagher wrote: > Hi, >I've been using Xenomai for a couple of years now and having been > preparing my first patch. > I'd love to help any way that is needed. Documentation may be a good place > for me to start. There is no shortage of work on the documentation

Re: [Xenomai] [RFC] RTnet, Analogy and the elephant in the room

2017-11-22 Thread Greg Gallagher
9AA > Catalonia > - > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing in

Re: [Xenomai] [RFC] RTnet, Analogy and the elephant in the room

2017-11-22 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
-- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/attachments/20171122/af6d7b02/attachment.sig> _

Re: [Xenomai] list of threads with same session_label

2017-11-22 Thread Hänel-Baas , Alexander
Hi Philippe, thanks for your response. > Assuming alchemy is your API, enable the user-space registry with > --enable-registry when configuring. Your application will automatically > maintain /var/run/xenomai///alchemy/tasks. Reading from this > file should give you the information needed.

Re: [Xenomai] [RFC] RTnet, Analogy and the elephant in the room

2017-11-22 Thread Norbert Lange
Hi, not really happy to hear that, but this was already my impression. There is alot of knowledge of kernel, hardware and bootloader knowledge necessary to be able to maintain the ipipe patch, as newcomer to most of these I am just helpless. Unless someone is dedicated to that, there is not

[Xenomai] Updating from 3.0.5 to 3.0.6

2017-11-22 Thread Fazio Maurizio
I have a stupid question… I would like to upgrade my current xenomai 3.0.5 based system to xenomai 3.0.6… I need to repatch the kernel with the prepare-kernel script or I can only rebuild and execute a make install? Maurizio Fazio Chief Technical Office / Aircraft Systems Software Engineer

[Xenomai] R: Re:R: install xenomai on centos

2017-11-22 Thread Fazio Maurizio
dules_install && make install #reboot but the >system can't boot from kernel 3.10.32, and there was no any display on screen. > > > > >-- > >操千曲而后晓声,观千剑而后识器。 >___ >Xenomai mailin