Re: [Xenomai] RTnet fixes - testers needed

On 2017-12-15 21:42, Philippe Gerum wrote: > On 12/15/2017 02:48 PM, Philippe Gerum wrote: >> On 12/15/2017 02:40 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>> On 2017-12-15 14:29, Philippe Gerum wrote: On 12/15/2017 02:20 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2017-12-15 13:25, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: >>

Re: [Xenomai] ipipe: 4.4 BUG on x86, maybe on 4.9 as well

On 2017-12-15 22:29, Philippe Gerum wrote: > On 12/15/2017 06:53 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2017-12-15 17:45, Philippe Gerum wrote: >>> On 12/15/2017 04:02 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: On 2017-12-15 15:44, Philippe Gerum wrote: > On 12/15/2017 03:24 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2017-12-14

[Xenomai] xenomai cyclictest negative Max value

Hi All, I compiled xenomai-next on my ARM64 platform, but met Max and Avg not correct. See below: ./cyclictest -a -t10 -n -p99 -c 0 # /dev/cpu_dma_latency set to 0us policy: fifo: loadavg: 0.97 0.51 0.21 1/135 3018 policy: fifo: loadavg: 1.00 0.76 0.38 1/128 3018 T:[ 200.650323] random: crng

Re: [Xenomai] xenomai on ARM64 question

On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 02:50:39PM +0100, Jorge Ramirez wrote: >On 12/17/2017 02:47 PM, Jorge Ramirez wrote: >> On 12/17/2017 12:07 PM, Peng Fan wrote: >> > Hi Jorge, >> > >> > On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 07:28:38PM +0100, Jorge Ramirez wrote: >> > > On 12/16/2017 02:31 PM, Peng Fan wrote: >> > > >

Re: [Xenomai] RTnet fixes - testers needed

On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Philippe Gerum wrote: > On 12/17/2017 12:01 AM, Andreas Glatz wrote: >>> >>> I pushed a pile of RTnet fixes in a WIP branch of the official repo >>> (wip/rtnet-fixes). Most of them address invalid direct references to >>> user memory from kernel

[Xenomai] Looking ahead, for fun

Dual kernel systems such as Cobalt need Linux to exhibit a high-priority execution stage, for running out of band co-kernel activities. This is the purpose of the I-pipe layer, patched in the mainline kernel for supporting Cobalt. In order to keep pace with mainline Linux development, this

[Xenomai] New year, new roles

Sixteen years after Gilles and I founded the Xenomai project, time has come for me to hand over the leadership to a contributor recognized for his skills, bringing fresh ideas, and a creative roadmap. Jan Kiszka has agreed to take over the Xenomai leadership gradually from me. He will be ramping

[Xenomai] Ongoing work

Some news about the ongoing day-to-day work: - the Xenomai repository is being rehosted to the gitlab facility offered by Denx Software Engineering (thanks Wolfgang), which currently mirrors the original tree. We are working at making the final repository publicly accessible before Xmas. We are

Re: [Xenomai] Xenomai on Arm64

Hi, So the best approach here would be to try to use a patch that is close to 4.4.15. Apply the ipipe patches and you'll have to resolve to conflicts by hand. I'm not sure how many conflicts you'll find. Thanks Greg From: yuboch...@live.cn Sent: December 17, 2017 12:22

Re: [Xenomai] (no subject)

How did you install it in the first place? What platform are you using? X86, arm, ppc??   Original Message   From: samiraelmada...@gmail.com Sent: December 17, 2017 11:49 AM To: xenomai@xenomai.org Subject: [Xenomai] (no subject) please to uninstall xenomai or reconfigure it ,because it sounds

Re: [Xenomai] Xenomai on Arm64

Hi Greg, I'm using L4T. The feedback from 'uname -r' is: 4.4.15-tegra Would that be a problem? Thank you! Bocheng Yu From: Greg Gallagher Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2017 10:24 To: ?? ?; xenomai@xenomai.org Subject: Re: [Xenomai] Xenomai

[Xenomai] (no subject)

please to uninstall xenomai or reconfigure it ,because it sounds like there is a problem in the configuration so that when I execute ./latency I got just the first three lines == Sampling period: 100 us == Test mode: periodic user-mode task == All results in microseconds

Re: [Xenomai] Xenomai on Arm64

On 12/17/2017 05:38 PM, Greg Gallagher wrote: > > I believe Arm64 is only in the next branch, but i'll leave that to someone > else to confirm or correct. That is correct. > > Greg > >   Original Message   > From: g...@embeddedgreg.com > Sent: December 17, 2017 10:24 AM > To:

Re: [Xenomai] Xenomai on Arm64

I believe Arm64 is only in the next branch, but i'll leave that to someone else to confirm or correct. Greg   Original Message   From: g...@embeddedgreg.com Sent: December 17, 2017 10:24 AM To: yuboch...@live.cn; xenomai@xenomai.org Subject: Re: [Xenomai] Xenomai on Arm64 What kernel are you

Re: [Xenomai] Xenomai on Arm64

What kernel are you using L4T or mainline? Sent from my BlackBerry - the most secure mobile device - via the Rogers Network   Original Message   From: yuboch...@live.cn Sent: December 17, 2017 9:44 AM To: xenomai@xenomai.org Subject: [Xenomai] Xenomai on Arm64 Hi, I'm trying to patch Xenomai

[Xenomai] Xenomai on Arm64

Hi, I'm trying to patch Xenomai on Nvidia TX2, an Arm64 processor. When I used Xenomai 3.0.5 and ipipe-core-4.9.24-arm64-2.patch, I was not allowed config the kernel. As I understood, this is because Xenomai 3.0.5 doesn't fully support Arm64 (/kernel/cobalt/arch/arm64 is empty). So I was

Re: [Xenomai] problem xenomai

On 12/17/2017 02:43 PM, samira elmadani wrote: > Hello please I have a problem and I don't know if I must reinstall xenomai > or what exactly, > > I have installed xenomai-2.6.4 and I can star it but the problem is that > when I use ./latency I have as result only the first 3 lines > The 2.6.x

[Xenomai-git] Philippe Gerum : net/udp: ioctl: fix temp arg buffer type

Module: xenomai-3 Branch: wip/rtnet-fixes Commit: e5c278dc57131d3885fcea24da1d14815724eda6 URL: http://git.xenomai.org/?p=xenomai-3.git;a=commit;h=e5c278dc57131d3885fcea24da1d14815724eda6 Author: Philippe Gerum Date: Sun Dec 17 15:27:04 2017 +0100 net/udp: ioctl: fix

Re: [Xenomai] RTnet fixes - testers needed

On 12/17/2017 12:01 AM, Andreas Glatz wrote: >> >> I pushed a pile of RTnet fixes in a WIP branch of the official repo >> (wip/rtnet-fixes). Most of them address invalid direct references to >> user memory from kernel space (instead of properly copying back and >> forth via the copy_from/to_user

Re: [Xenomai] xenomai on ARM64 question

On 12/17/2017 02:47 PM, Jorge Ramirez wrote: On 12/17/2017 12:07 PM, Peng Fan wrote: Hi Jorge, On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 07:28:38PM +0100, Jorge Ramirez wrote: On 12/16/2017 02:31 PM, Peng Fan wrote: On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 05:53:43PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote: Hi Philippe, On Thu, Dec 14, 2017

Re: [Xenomai] xenomai on ARM64 question

On 12/17/2017 12:07 PM, Peng Fan wrote: Hi Jorge, On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 07:28:38PM +0100, Jorge Ramirez wrote: On 12/16/2017 02:31 PM, Peng Fan wrote: On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 05:53:43PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote: Hi Philippe, On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 05:39:10PM +0100, Philippe Gerum wrote: On

[Xenomai] problem xenomai

Hello please I have a problem and I don't know if I must reinstall xenomai or what exactly, I have installed xenomai-2.6.4 and I can star it but the problem is that when I use ./latency I have as result only the first 3 lines == Sampling period: 100 us == Test mode: periodic user-mode task ==

Re: [Xenomai] xenomai on ARM64 question

Hi Jorge, On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 07:28:38PM +0100, Jorge Ramirez wrote: >On 12/16/2017 02:31 PM, Peng Fan wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 05:53:43PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote: >> > Hi Philippe, >> > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 05:39:10PM +0100, Philippe Gerum wrote: >> > > On 12/14/2017 11:23 AM, Peng