Le jeudi 01 août 2019 à 13:25 +0200, Jan Kiszka a écrit :
> On 01.08.19 11:53, Julien Blanc via Xenomai wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Let’s say i have four threads :
> > * thread 1, RT, with SCHED_FIFO policy and a sched_param value of
> > 90
> > * thread 2, RT, with SCHED_WEAK policy and a sched_param
On 8/1/19 11:53 AM, Julien Blanc via Xenomai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a bit puzzled about how SCHED_WEAK behaves vs linux regular
> threads.
>
> Suppose a kernel built without CONFIG_XENO_OPT_SCHED_WEAK (so, only 0
> is a valid value for sched_priority, which should be the same as
> SCHED_OTHER).
>
On 01.08.19 11:53, Julien Blanc via Xenomai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm a bit puzzled about how SCHED_WEAK behaves vs linux regular
> threads.
>
> Suppose a kernel built without CONFIG_XENO_OPT_SCHED_WEAK (so, only 0
> is a valid value for sched_priority, which should be the same as
> SCHED_OTHER).
>
Hi,
I'm a bit puzzled about how SCHED_WEAK behaves vs linux regular
threads.
Suppose a kernel built without CONFIG_XENO_OPT_SCHED_WEAK (so, only 0
is a valid value for sched_priority, which should be the same as
SCHED_OTHER).
Let’s say i have four threads :
* thread 1, RT, with SCHED_FIFO
Here are the warning and error outputs of my built: Do you have any ideas I
can change this? I appreciate any suggestions.
Initialising tasks: 100% |###| Time:
0:00:17
NOTE: Executing SetScene Tasks
NOTE: Executing RunQueue Tasks
WARNING: bzip2-1.0.6-r5
Here are the warning and error outputs of my built: Do you have any ideas I
can change this? I appreciate any suggestions.
Initialising tasks: 100% |###| Time:
0:00:17
NOTE: Executing SetScene Tasks
NOTE: Executing RunQueue Tasks
WARNING: bzip2-1.0.6-r5