On 14.11.19 06:05, Jeff Webb via Xenomai wrote:
I would like to revive this thread from several months ago:
https://xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/2019-March/040498.html
The issue is that on some hardware (a specific rack-mount PC with a PICMG
daughtercard on a backplane containing PCI and PCIe
On 14.11.19 02:58, Jeff Webb via Xenomai wrote:
Lange Norbert via Xenomai wrote:
From: Jan Kiszka
On 13.11.19 16:18, Lange Norbert via Xenomai wrote:
I am running into some bad issues with debugging, can't really narrow
down when they happen, but usually when I run through GDB and want to
"bre
> I would like to revive this thread from several months ago:
> https://xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/2019-March/040498.html
> The issue is that on some hardware (a specific rack-mount PC with a PICMG
> daughtercard on a backplane containing PCI and PCIe slots) I get an INTR-REMAP
> error when
It's a must go.
One or 2 guys from Smile are Buildroot developers. The BR dev days meeting
is hosted by Google just after FOSDEM.
https://www.elinux.org/Buildroot:DeveloperDaysFOSDEM2019
Should be fine to get a similar approach (?)
Le mer. 13 nov. 2019 à 09:12, Jan Leupold via Xenomai
a écrit
I would like to revive this thread from several months ago:
https://xenomai.org/pipermail/xenomai/2019-March/040498.html
The issue is that on some hardware (a specific rack-mount PC with a PICMG
daughtercard on a backplane containing PCI and PCIe slots) I get an INTR-REMAP
error when trying to
Jeff Webb wrote:
> I have personally experienced what seems (to me) to be a similar
> issue involving signal handling where a signal handling thread
> received a SIGINT via sigwait (other threads had SIGINT blocked),
> and tried to set a global variable that should have caused the
> other threads t
Lange Norbert via Xenomai wrote:
> > From: Jan Kiszka
> > On 13.11.19 16:18, Lange Norbert via Xenomai wrote:
> > > I am running into some bad issues with debugging, can't really narrow
> > > down when they happen, but usually when I run through GDB and want to
> > > "break" (pause execution), it
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Kiszka
> Sent: Mittwoch, 13. November 2019 18:42
> To: Lange Norbert ; Xenomai
> (xenomai@xenomai.org)
> Subject: Re: Xenomai crashes when braking into the debugger
>
> NON-ANDRITZ SOURCE: BE CAUTIOUS WITH CONTENT, LINKS OR
> ATTACHMENTS.
>
>
> On 13.11.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Kiszka
> Sent: Mittwoch, 13. November 2019 18:39
> To: Lange Norbert ; Xenomai
> (xenomai@xenomai.org)
> Subject: Re: RTnet sendmmsg and ENOBUFS
>
> NON-ANDRITZ SOURCE: BE CAUTIOUS WITH CONTENT, LINKS OR
> ATTACHMENTS.
>
>
> On 13.11.19 16:10, Lange Norb
On 13.11.19 16:18, Lange Norbert via Xenomai wrote:
Hello,
I am running into some bad issues with debugging,
can't really narrow down when they happen, but usually when I run through GDB and want to
"break" (pause execution),
it seems to be related to *other* Xenomai programs running at the sam
On 13.11.19 16:10, Lange Norbert via Xenomai wrote:
Hello,
for one of our applications, we have (unfortunatly) a single ethernet
connection for Realtime and Nonrealtime.
We solve this by sending timeslices with RT first, then filling up the
remaining space. When stressing the limits (quite po
Hello,
I am running into some bad issues with debugging,
can't really narrow down when they happen, but usually when I run through GDB
and want to "break" (pause execution),
it seems to be related to *other* Xenomai programs running at the same time (as
said its hard to narrow down).
Kind regar
Hello,
for one of our applications, we have (unfortunatly) a single ethernet
connection for Realtime and Nonrealtime.
We solve this by sending timeslices with RT first, then filling up the
remaining space. When stressing the limits (quite possibly beyond if accounting
for bugs),
the sendmmsg c
On 10.11.19 18:25, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On 11/7/19 11:12 AM, davy.regn...@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr wrote:
On 06.11.19 15:23, davy.regn...@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr wrote:
On 06.11.19 14:40, davy.regn...@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr wrote:
On 06.11.19 10:18, Davy via Xenomai wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for patc
Am 11.11.19 um 10:32 schrieb Jan Kiszka via Xenomai:
> On 11.11.19 10:20, Pierre FICHEUX via Xenomai wrote:
>> Should be fine. IMHO Xenomai project is a must but lacks communication and
>> events (compared to PREMPT_RT) :-)
>>
>
> I don't disagree. And I welcome when things are not only kicked off
15 matches
Mail list logo
