Jan Kiszka writes:
> On 26.05.22 18:19, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>
>> jamiens...@163.com writes:
>>
>>> From: Jamie Huang
>>>
>>> In v5.18-evl-rebase, function kernel_fpu_disabled() has been removed in
>>> commit 59f5ede3bc0f("x86/fpu: Prevent FPU state corruption"), so we will
>>> get
On 26.05.22 18:19, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>
> jamiens...@163.com writes:
>
>> From: Jamie Huang
>>
>> In v5.18-evl-rebase, function kernel_fpu_disabled() has been removed in
>> commit 59f5ede3bc0f("x86/fpu: Prevent FPU state corruption"), so we will
>> get compile error when CONFIG_DOVETAIL is
jamiens...@163.com writes:
> From: Jamie Huang
>
> In v5.18-evl-rebase, function kernel_fpu_disabled() has been removed in
> commit 59f5ede3bc0f("x86/fpu: Prevent FPU state corruption"), so we will
> get compile error when CONFIG_DOVETAIL is enabled:
> arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c:931:6: error:
From: Jamie Huang
In v5.18-evl-rebase, function kernel_fpu_disabled() has been removed in
commit 59f5ede3bc0f("x86/fpu: Prevent FPU state corruption"), so we will
get compile error when CONFIG_DOVETAIL is enabled:
arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c:931:6: error: implicit declaration of function
On 16.05.22 17:59, Bezdeka, Florian via Xenomai wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-05-16 at 23:32 +0800, Jamie Huang via Xenomai wrote:
>> From: Jamie
>
> It's up to Jan but I guess a complete name would be nice here. Same
> fore the Signed-off-by below.
Philippe is maintaining the dovetail tree but, yes,
On Mon, 2022-05-16 at 23:32 +0800, Jamie Huang via Xenomai wrote:
> From: Jamie
It's up to Jan but I guess a complete name would be nice here. Same
fore the Signed-off-by below.
>
> In v5.18-evl-rebase, function kernel_fpu_disabled() has been removed in
> commit 59f5ede3bc0f("x86/fpu: Prevent
From: Jamie
In v5.18-evl-rebase, function kernel_fpu_disabled() has been removed in
commit 59f5ede3bc0f("x86/fpu: Prevent FPU state corruption"), so we will
get compile error when CONFIG_DOVETAIL is enabled:
arch/x86/kernel/fpu/core.c:931:6: error: implicit declaration of function
