Re: [Xenomai] Posix vs Alchemy - multiplexing and registry

2018-01-25 Thread Philippe Gerum
On 01/25/2018 04:14 PM, Julien Blanc wrote: > Le jeudi 25 janvier 2018 à 15:21 +0100, Philippe Gerum a écrit : >> On 01/25/2018 02:43 PM, Julien Blanc wrote: >>>   >> There is no provision for I/O multiplexing with alchemy. Only the >> pipe object embeds a RTDM file descriptor which could be

Re: [Xenomai] Posix vs Alchemy - multiplexing and registry

2018-01-25 Thread Julien Blanc
Le jeudi 25 janvier 2018 à 15:21 +0100, Philippe Gerum a écrit : > On 01/25/2018 02:43 PM, Julien Blanc wrote: > >  > There is no provision for I/O multiplexing with alchemy. Only the > pipe object embeds a RTDM file descriptor which could be passed to > libcobalt's select() implementation, other

Re: [Xenomai] Posix vs Alchemy - multiplexing and registry

2018-01-25 Thread Philippe Gerum
On 01/25/2018 02:43 PM, Julien Blanc wrote: > Hi, > > We have a xenomai 3 application currently using the alchemy API > (application development started on xenomai 2.x). > > We would like to add I/O multiplexing in some parts of the application. > My understanding is that it is not supported by

[Xenomai] Posix vs Alchemy - multiplexing and registry

2018-01-25 Thread Julien Blanc
Hi, We have a xenomai 3 application currently using the alchemy API (application development started on xenomai 2.x). We would like to add I/O multiplexing in some parts of the application. My understanding is that it is not supported by the alchemy API, so we would have to resort to the Posix