On 11/23/2017 03:35 PM, Cédric Perles wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I’m working on an iMX6 based board with NXP kernel 4.1.15.
>
>>> Vendor kernels for i.MX6 are creepy (another vowel comes to mind). A
>>> recent mainline kernel is just fine if the SoC supports it. If not,
>>> porting the SoC (and/or
>> Hi,
>>
>> I’m working on an iMX6 based board with NXP kernel 4.1.15.
>> Vendor kernels for i.MX6 are creepy (another vowel comes to mind). A
>> recent mainline kernel is just fine if the SoC supports it. If not,
>> porting the SoC (and/or missing driver) to mainline is often much >
>>
On 11/22/2017 05:10 PM, Cédric Perles wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’m working on an iMX6 based board with NXP kernel 4.1.15.
Vendor kernels for i.MX6 are creepy (another vowel comes to mind). A
recent mainline kernel is just fine if the SoC supports it. If not,
porting the SoC (and/or missing driver) to
Hi,
Im working on an iMX6 based board with NXP kernel 4.1.15.
I would like to understand why latency max returned by cyclictest
increases from 20µs to 100µs when dohell accesses to USB.
Since i-pipe tracer refuses to work, I used ftrace to record cobalt,
scheduling and irq events. Here is what