On 08/17/2012 04:24 PM, Charles Retailleau wrote:
> Thanks Lennart that was very useful, it now works.
> Here is the little patch I made, yet I couldn't find a switch to force
> it for core e500/e500xx only...
>
>
> --- ./xenomai-2.6.1.orig/include/asm-powerpc/syscall.h2011-11-09
> 13:21
On 08/17/2012 05:37 PM, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On 08/17/2012 05:11 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 08/17/2012 05:02 PM, Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>> On 08/17/2012 04:41 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 08/17/2012 04:24 PM, Charles Retailleau wrote:
> Thanks Lennart that was very usef
On 08/17/2012 05:11 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 08/17/2012 05:02 PM, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On 08/17/2012 04:41 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 08/17/2012 04:24 PM, Charles Retailleau wrote:
Thanks Lennart that was very useful, it now works.
Here is the little patch I made, yet I coul
On 08/17/2012 05:02 PM, Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On 08/17/2012 04:41 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 08/17/2012 04:24 PM, Charles Retailleau wrote:
>>> Thanks Lennart that was very useful, it now works.
>>> Here is the little patch I made, yet I couldn't find a switch to force
>>> it for core
On 08/17/2012 04:41 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 08/17/2012 04:24 PM, Charles Retailleau wrote:
Thanks Lennart that was very useful, it now works.
Here is the little patch I made, yet I couldn't find a switch to force
it for core e500/e500xx only...
--- ./xenomai-2.6.1.orig/include/asm-p
On 08/17/2012 04:24 PM, Charles Retailleau wrote:
> Thanks Lennart that was very useful, it now works.
> Here is the little patch I made, yet I couldn't find a switch to force
> it for core e500/e500xx only...
>
>
> --- ./xenomai-2.6.1.orig/include/asm-powerpc/syscall.h2011-11-09
> 13:21:
Thanks Lennart that was very useful, it now works.
Here is the little patch I made, yet I couldn't find a switch to force
it for core e500/e500xx only...
--- ./xenomai-2.6.1.orig/include/asm-powerpc/syscall.h 2011-11-09
13:21:36.0 +0100
+++ ./xenomai-2.6.1.mine/./include/asm-powerpc/sysc
On 08/16/2012 04:46 PM, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 04:30:39PM +0200, Charles Retailleau wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> The patching/compilation/installation steps seem fine.
>> But at the end I cannot have any Xenomai software running on the
>> P1010RDB (I tried most of the provided te
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 04:30:39PM +0200, Charles Retailleau wrote:
> Hi all,
> The patching/compilation/installation steps seem fine.
> But at the end I cannot have any Xenomai software running on the
> P1010RDB (I tried most of the provided test SW).
>
> I focused on latency and tried to debug i
Hi all,
The patching/compilation/installation steps seem fine.
But at the end I cannot have any Xenomai software running on the
P1010RDB (I tried most of the provided test SW).
I focused on latency and tried to debug it. I get that:
Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction.
0x0ffde120
10 matches
Mail list logo