On 17.12.21 08:55, C Smith wrote:
> There are development scenarios where different versions of a driver
> are substituted. I can tell you some long stories when one day we meet
> over a few beers...
I can imagine those cases - but only when you patch the driver locally
anyway. In that case, a
On 17.12.21 09:03, Konstantin Smola via Xenomai wrote:
> Added verbosity to 16550A serial driver. dmesg shows the driver version,
> ports, irqs, baudbase.
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Smola
> ---
> kernel/drivers/serial/16550A.c | 16 ++--
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2
On 03.01.22 17:34, Florian Bezdeka wrote:
> On 13.10.21 13:55, Jan Kiszka via Xenomai wrote:
>> From: Jan Kiszka
>>
>> VM_DENYWRITE was removed in 5.15, so we need a different criteria.
>> Absence of a file-backing seems to be a good one.
>
> Bringing this one up, because we recently had a
From: Jan Kiszka
VM_DENYWRITE was removed in 5.15, so we need a different criteria.
Presence of a file-backing seems to be a good one.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
---
Changes in v2:
- fixed inverted logic
- adjusted description
kernel/cobalt/debug.c | 12 +---
1 file changed, 5
On 13.10.21 13:55, Jan Kiszka via Xenomai wrote:
> From: Jan Kiszka
>
> VM_DENYWRITE was removed in 5.15, so we need a different criteria.
> Absence of a file-backing seems to be a good one.
Bringing this one up, because we recently had a "report" on the ML
regarding VM_DENYWRITE.
I scanned
On 03.01.22 19:04, Jan Kiszka via Xenomai wrote:
> On 03.01.22 17:34, Florian Bezdeka wrote:
>> On 13.10.21 13:55, Jan Kiszka via Xenomai wrote:
>>> From: Jan Kiszka
>>>
>>> VM_DENYWRITE was removed in 5.15, so we need a different criteria.
>>> Absence of a file-backing seems to be a good one.
>>
On 19.12.21 10:38, Dario Binacchi wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Dario Binacchi
>
> ---
>
> Changes in v5:
> - Add the patch to the series.
>
> include/cobalt/uapi/corectl.h | 2 ++
> kernel/drivers/can/Makefile | 4 +--
> kernel/drivers/can/corectl.c | 41
On Sun, Jan 2, 2022 at 11:38 PM Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
> On 03.01.22 08:29, C Smith wrote:
> > I have been getting kernel Oopses with x86 Xenomai 3.1 (and 3.2.1).
> > In numerous tests, I can't keep a computer running for more than a day
> > before the computer hard-locks (no kbd/mouse/ping).
On 03.01.22 22:12, C Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 2, 2022 at 11:38 PM Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
>> On 03.01.22 08:29, C Smith wrote:
>>> I have been getting kernel Oopses with x86 Xenomai 3.1 (and 3.2.1).
>>> In numerous tests, I can't keep a computer running for more than a day
>>> before the computer
On Mon, Jan 3, 2022 at 11:05 PM Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
> On 03.01.22 22:12, C Smith wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 2, 2022 at 11:38 PM Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>
> >> On 03.01.22 08:29, C Smith wrote:
> >>> I have been getting kernel Oopses with x86 Xenomai 3.1 (and 3.2.1).
> >>> In numerous tests, I can't
10 matches
Mail list logo