Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH 0/7] Host realtime clock support

2010-07-03 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Wolfgang Mauerer wrote: Some points that may require further discussion: - POSIX only specifies a few clock_ids, and these have already been extended by the Linux kernel. We use the maximum id (16) for the new clock, but it might also make sense to use 7 (CLOCK_MONOTONIC_COARSE+1) or

Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH 0/7] Host realtime clock support

2010-07-03 Thread Wolfgang Mauerer
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Mauerer wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Mauerer wrote: This update_vsyscall code would call ipipe_dispatch_event to pass the data to Xenomai. okay. That seems to have dropped from my radar, as I don't recall having any issues with this

Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH 0/7] Host realtime clock support

2010-07-03 Thread Wolfgang Mauerer
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Mauerer wrote: Some points that may require further discussion: - POSIX only specifies a few clock_ids, and these have already been extended by the Linux kernel. We use the maximum id (16) for the new clock, but it might also make sense to use 7

Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH 0/7] Host realtime clock support

2010-07-02 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Wolfgang Mauerer wrote: (This is the Xenomai part of the mechanism, please see the ipipe mailing list for the patches that provide the required basis infrastructure) This patch series extends Xenomai with a new clock, CLOCK_HOST_REALTIME. It allows for sharing NTP-corrected real time

Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH 0/7] Host realtime clock support

2010-07-02 Thread Wolfgang Mauerer
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Mauerer wrote: (This is the Xenomai part of the mechanism, please see the ipipe mailing list for the patches that provide the required basis infrastructure) This patch series extends Xenomai with a new clock, CLOCK_HOST_REALTIME. It allows for sharing