On Wed, 2009-12-16 at 10:53 +0100, Fabrice Gasnier wrote:
Hello,
Please find attached a new patch that should take your latest remarks
into account.
Merged, thanks.
Regards,
Fabrice.
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 10:42 +0100, Fabrice Gasnier wrote:
Hello,
I come back to you to
Hello,
Please find attached a new patch that should take your latest remarks
into account.
Regards,
Fabrice.
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 10:42 +0100, Fabrice Gasnier wrote:
Hello,
I come back to you to submit a slightly different patch.
I observed that __psos_t_delete sometimes returns
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 10:42 +0100, Fabrice Gasnier wrote:
Hello,
I come back to you to submit a slightly different patch.
I observed that __psos_t_delete sometimes returns ERR_OBJID after
pthread_cancel has been issued, due to thread isn't found on kernel side.
The attached patch uses the
Hello,
I come back to you to submit a slightly different patch.
I observed that __psos_t_delete sometimes returns ERR_OBJID after
pthread_cancel has been issued, due to thread isn't found on kernel side.
The attached patch uses the same mechanism as in native API
(rt_task_delete) where
Hello,
Please find attached a new patch that should take into account your
latest remarks.
This patch has been created using 'git diff -p' command and applies on
2.4.10 revision.
I'm not sure I fully understand your remark on missing critical section.
Indeed, this code is similar to __t_delete
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 15:11 +0100, Alexandre Coffignal wrote:
Hello,
Please find attached a new patch that should take into account your
latest remarks.
This patch has been created using 'git diff -p' command and applies on
2.4.10 revision.
I'm not sure I fully understand your remark on
