Hi Jan,
As lighter may mean that reducing the structure size also
reduces the number of used cache lines, it might be a good
idea. The additional complexity for entry removal is negligible.
My current working version is already lighter when it comes to the size
of additional data
Hi Jan,
As lighter may mean that reducing the structure size also
reduces the number of used cache lines, it might be a good
idea. The additional complexity for entry removal is negligible.
My current working version is already lighter when it comes to the size
of additional data
Hi Dmitry,
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi,
here goes another implementation of shared irqs on the nucleus layer.
I have conducted a few tests and it seems to work. The test example is
attached.
There were 2 main issues concerning synchronization:
1) xnintr_attach() vs. xnintr_detach()
