Re: [Xenomai-core] Xenomai in Debian

2010-02-24 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 14:06 +0100, Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote:
 Hi Philippe,
 
 Am 23.02.2010 18:46, schrieb Philippe Gerum:
  On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 17:52 +0100, Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote:
  Hi,
 
  Am 14.02.2010 10:38, schrieb Philippe Gerum:
 
  snip
  In the future, maybe we could simply provide a wrapper script accepting
  sub-commands, such as xeno latency, xeno sigtest etc, to be put
  into /usr/bin by distros, which would hide the actual location of those
  binaries?
 
  In any case, thanks for your work so far. We probably need to discuss
  the packaging issues on this list, so that we get both consistency and
  usability in the future.
 
  Gilles and Roland, if this is fine with you, I'll handle the liaison
  role with upstream packagers, so please CC me explicitly on those mails.
  We'll sort out this issue, it doesn't look that bad anyway.
 
  Roland added a xeno wrapper to the debian.org xenomai package 2.5.1-3.
 
  I synced now the debian/ directories from debian.org and xenomai.org:
   - For debian.org I sent patches to the Debian bugtracker [1] [2].
 Another patch for dpkg-cross support [3] I sent to Roland privately.
   - For xenomai.org I attached patches to this mail (against -2.5.git).
 
  If both parties apply the patches the debian directories are in sync,
  except some minor differences in the debian/control file, see patch
  do-not-commit-please.patch. I would like to keep these changes out so
  that the xenomai.org packages are compatible with Debian 5.0 Lenny.
  The debian.org packages are for Debian 6.0 Squeeze.
 
  
  Merged into my queue (except the last one as mentioned). This will be
  pushed upstream to Gilles for 2.5.2. Thanks.
 
 I took a look at your branch for-upstream. Your commit
   scripts: add wrapper script to run standard Xenomai commands
   6e0574791f48cbf8b3421a68c5789254e7d084b7
 adds the same wrapper as my patch 
 0005-debian-wrapper-script-usr-bin-xeno-to-call-executa.patch
   debian: wrapper script /usr/bin/xeno to call executables in 
 /usr/lib/xenomai/
   fbe86cc50d3a65cd23e93d43adba4ed369fe70b1
 Please revert the commit of my patch, we need another fix for debian/rules 
 for your wrapper.
 

Ok, I thought your patch set was based on my tree, so I did not check
thoroughly. I did not send any pull request to Gilles, so no harm done.

 How do I call configure to install the wrapper in /usr/bin and
 the programs like latency, switchtest etc. to /usr/lib/xenomai ?
 

We need some fixage in scripts/wrappers/Makefile.am to do that. I'll
prepare this asap.

 Stefan
 
  
  Thanks
  kisda
 
  [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=571099
  [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=571104
  [3] 
  http://git.xenomai.org/?p=xenomai-2.5.git;a=commitdiff;h=5bcd18f714f4cbeaaac0cc4a08e6c9f375aa3b77
  
  
 
 


-- 
Philippe.



___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


Re: [Xenomai-core] Xenomai in Debian

2010-02-24 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 14:11 +0100, Philippe Gerum wrote:
 On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 14:06 +0100, Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote:
  Hi Philippe,
  
  Am 23.02.2010 18:46, schrieb Philippe Gerum:
   On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 17:52 +0100, Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote:
   Hi,
  
   Am 14.02.2010 10:38, schrieb Philippe Gerum:
  
   snip
   In the future, maybe we could simply provide a wrapper script accepting
   sub-commands, such as xeno latency, xeno sigtest etc, to be put
   into /usr/bin by distros, which would hide the actual location of those
   binaries?
  
   In any case, thanks for your work so far. We probably need to discuss
   the packaging issues on this list, so that we get both consistency and
   usability in the future.
  
   Gilles and Roland, if this is fine with you, I'll handle the liaison
   role with upstream packagers, so please CC me explicitly on those mails.
   We'll sort out this issue, it doesn't look that bad anyway.
  
   Roland added a xeno wrapper to the debian.org xenomai package 2.5.1-3.
  
   I synced now the debian/ directories from debian.org and xenomai.org:
- For debian.org I sent patches to the Debian bugtracker [1] [2].
  Another patch for dpkg-cross support [3] I sent to Roland privately.
- For xenomai.org I attached patches to this mail (against -2.5.git).
  
   If both parties apply the patches the debian directories are in sync,
   except some minor differences in the debian/control file, see patch
   do-not-commit-please.patch. I would like to keep these changes out so
   that the xenomai.org packages are compatible with Debian 5.0 Lenny.
   The debian.org packages are for Debian 6.0 Squeeze.
  
   
   Merged into my queue (except the last one as mentioned). This will be
   pushed upstream to Gilles for 2.5.2. Thanks.
  
  I took a look at your branch for-upstream. Your commit
scripts: add wrapper script to run standard Xenomai commands
6e0574791f48cbf8b3421a68c5789254e7d084b7
  adds the same wrapper as my patch 
  0005-debian-wrapper-script-usr-bin-xeno-to-call-executa.patch
debian: wrapper script /usr/bin/xeno to call executables in 
  /usr/lib/xenomai/
fbe86cc50d3a65cd23e93d43adba4ed369fe70b1
  Please revert the commit of my patch, we need another fix for debian/rules 
  for your wrapper.
  
 
 Ok, I thought your patch set was based on my tree, so I did not check
 thoroughly. I did not send any pull request to Gilles, so no harm done.
 
  How do I call configure to install the wrapper in /usr/bin and
  the programs like latency, switchtest etc. to /usr/lib/xenomai ?
  
 
 We need some fixage in scripts/wrappers/Makefile.am to do that. I'll
 prepare this asap.

scripts/Makefile.am...

 
  Stefan
  
   
   Thanks
   kisda
  
   [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=571099
   [2] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=571104
   [3] 
   http://git.xenomai.org/?p=xenomai-2.5.git;a=commitdiff;h=5bcd18f714f4cbeaaac0cc4a08e6c9f375aa3b77
   
   
  
  
 
 


-- 
Philippe.



___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


Re: [Xenomai-core] Yet another ((weak)) bug

2010-02-24 Thread Jan Kiszka
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
 Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote:
 Am 12.02.2010 17:22, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
 libxnskin or so?

 Jan

 libxenomai ?
 
 Ok. Let's go for libxenomai. I will try and do that in the next few days.
 

Already had a chance to look into this?

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


Re: [Xenomai-core] Yet another ((weak)) bug

2010-02-24 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Jan Kiszka wrote:
 Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
 Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote:
 Am 12.02.2010 17:22, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
 libxnskin or so?

 Jan

 libxenomai ?
 Ok. Let's go for libxenomai. I will try and do that in the next few days.

 
 Already had a chance to look into this?

No. I was off a few days. I just looked at it in the train, but could
not test it yet.

-- 
Gilles.

___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core