[Xenomai-core] ... the rt-preempt patch once been in fusion

Hi all! Well, subject says almost all. I remember there has been an effort to make a fusion/rt-preempt patch conglomerate back then. I'm just curious (as I've just been toying with the Molnar patch) - has that thing been dropped in xeno completely ? Thanks and best regards, Hannes.

[Xenomai-core] Re: [BUG] deleting a T_SUSP'ed native task

Jan Kiszka wrote: > Hi Gilles, > > were you able to successfully run my T_SUSP test-case after the latest > changes? For me this code still causes fatal exceptions: It seems I have been a bit optimistic then... I will check. -- Gilles Chanteperd

Re: [Xenomai-core] ... the rt-preempt patch once been in fusion

Ciao Philippe! Philippe Gerum wrote: [...] Clearly not, it is still on the project's agenda, but PREEMPT_RT has been too much of a moving target recently, not to speak of the vanilla 2.6 kernel itself. Recently ? As for Kernel 2.6 there has always been too much development for a stable relea

Re: [Xenomai-core] ... the rt-preempt patch once been in fusion

Hannes Mayer wrote: Hi all! Well, subject says almost all. I remember there has been an effort to make a fusion/rt-preempt patch conglomerate back then. I'm just curious (as I've just been toying with the Molnar patch) - has that thing been dropped in xeno completely ? Clearly not, it is stil

Re: [Xenomai-core] broken docs

Jan Kiszka wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: > > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > >> Looking at the difference between RTDM documentation blocks and the > >> other modules is that the other modules use the "fn" tag. Removing the > >> "fn" tag from other modules documentation blocks seems to solve the >

[Xenomai-core] ... the rt-preempt patch once been in fusion

Hi all! Well, subject says almost all. I remember there has been an effort to make a fusion/rt-preempt patch conglomerate back then. I'm just curious (as I've just been toying with the Molnar patch) - has that thing been dropped in xeno completely ? Thanks and best regards, Hannes.

[Xenomai-core] Re: [BUG] deleting a T_SUSP'ed native task

Jan Kiszka wrote: > Hi Gilles, > > were you able to successfully run my T_SUSP test-case after the latest > changes? For me this code still causes fatal exceptions: It seems I have been a bit optimistic then... I will check. -- Gilles Chanteperd

Re: [Xenomai-core] broken docs

Jan Kiszka wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: > > Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > >> Looking at the difference between RTDM documentation blocks and the > >> other modules is that the other modules use the "fn" tag. Removing the > >> "fn" tag from other modules documentation blocks seems to solve the >