On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 16:19 -0700, Wael Showair wrote:
Thanks philippe for ur reply, i have already read this part but i am
little confused about the same 2 questions i have sent
__
From: Philippe Gerum r...@xenomai.org
In some conditions, while testing Xenomai in VirtualBox, I had the error that
xnarch_init_timeconv() is called from init_32.h with a frequency of 0. That
leads to a division by zero, followed by a system oops.
Of course that is a bug in the virtualisation and Linux reports a CPU frequency
of 0 in
On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 19:58 +, Bernhard Walle wrote:
In some conditions, while testing Xenomai in VirtualBox, I had the error that
xnarch_init_timeconv() is called from init_32.h with a frequency of 0. That
leads to a division by zero, followed by a system oops.
Of course that is a bug
Hi,
I am working with the latest xenomai-head tree (we need analogy for
our NI board ...). Under Xenomai 2.4.8 our code did not have any mode
switches. Using the xenomai-head, we get a lot of mode switches. Using
he backtrace_symbols_fd, we get print-outs like:
xsimulation[0x808553b]
Stefan Schaal wrote:
Hi,
I am working with the latest xenomai-head tree (we need analogy for
our NI board ...). Under Xenomai 2.4.8 our code did not have any mode
switches. Using the xenomai-head, we get a lot of mode switches. Using
he backtrace_symbols_fd, we get print-outs like: