Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 20:33 +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 18:56 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi,
the following (academic?) scenario is not handled as expected by the
nucleus:
Prio ^
| -- T2
| /
|
Hi,
the following (academic?) scenario is not handled as expected by the
nucleus:
Prio ^
| -- T2
| /
| T0 - T1 - M1
| (M0) M0 (M1)
+
That means: Task T0 at, e.g., prio 1 holds mutex M0.
On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 18:56 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi,
the following (academic?) scenario is not handled as expected by the
nucleus:
Prio ^
| -- T2
| /
| T0 - T1 - M1
| (M0) M0 (M1)
+
On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 20:33 +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 18:56 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi,
the following (academic?) scenario is not handled as expected by the
nucleus:
Prio ^
| -- T2
| /
| T0 - T1
On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 20:33 +0200, Philippe Gerum wrote:
On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 18:56 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi,
the following (academic?) scenario is not handled as expected by the
nucleus:
Prio ^
| -- T2
| /
| T0 - T1