Jan Kiszka wrote:
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
decision (we could store the first pending thread priority in a
user/kernel shared area, with the complication that we would need
updating this priority if it ever changes, but to get the priority of
the current thread, we also need a syscall,
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
decision (we could store the first pending thread priority in a
user/kernel shared area, with the complication that we would need
updating this priority if it ever changes, but to get the priority of
the current
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi Gilles,
do you - or anyone else - happen to have some patches under preparation
to extend also the native skin with the newly added CONFIG_XENO_FASTSEM
support? Just to avoid duplicate work (we are about to work on this).
Not yet. But the fastsem work is largely
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi Gilles,
do you - or anyone else - happen to have some patches under preparation
to extend also the native skin with the newly added CONFIG_XENO_FASTSEM
support? Just to avoid duplicate work (we are about to work on this).
Not yet. But the
Hi Gilles,
do you - or anyone else - happen to have some patches under preparation
to extend also the native skin with the newly added CONFIG_XENO_FASTSEM
support? Just to avoid duplicate work (we are about to work on this).
Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi Gilles,
do you - or anyone else - happen to have some patches under preparation
to extend also the native skin with the newly added CONFIG_XENO_FASTSEM
support? Just to avoid duplicate work (we
