On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 08:12 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Again, the priority should not be the issue. The issue is likely that a
pending or just being handled non-RT IRQ can stall some RT IRQ at
hardware level. That must not happen. I-pipe
On 10/10/07, Philippe Gerum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 08:12 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Again, the priority should not be the issue. The issue is likely that a
pending or just being handled non-RT IRQ can stall some RT
On 10/10/07, Philippe Gerum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 10:54 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 10/10/07, Philippe Gerum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 08:12 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Again,
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 11:36 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 10/10/07, Philippe Gerum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 10:54 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
On 10/10/07, Philippe Gerum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 08:12 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Gregory CLEMENT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 9 oct. 2007 21:07
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] RTAI and Xenomai latency in kernel mode on
AT91SAM9261-EK
To: Jan Kiszka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2007/10/9, Jan Kiszka [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
Here,
Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Gregory CLEMENT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 9 oct. 2007 21:07
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] RTAI and Xenomai latency in kernel mode on
AT91SAM9261-EK
To: Jan Kiszka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2007/10/9, Jan Kiszka [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
first Xenomai:
#insmod
/lib/modules/2.6.20.13/kernel/drivers/xenomai/testing/xeno_timerbench.ko
#cd /usr/xenomai/bin/
Which versions were you using for both tests? Do you still have the
involved .configs?
Both version are 2.6.20.13
I join the config files.
BTW,
