Hi Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> Matthias Fuchs wrote:
>> Hi Wolfgang,
>>
>> Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>>> You have to define the real CAN system clock, which is 16/2 = 8 Mhz for
>>> most SJA 1000 hardware even if the oscillator is running at 16 MHz. I
>>> will add some
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hi Matthias,
Matthias Fuchs wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
You have to define the real CAN system clock, which is 16/2 = 8 Mhz for
most SJA 1000 hardware even if the oscillator is running at 16 MHz. I
will add some reasonable note to rtcan_dev.h
Is t
Hi Matthias,
Matthias Fuchs wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
You have to define the real CAN system clock, which is 16/2 = 8 Mhz for
most SJA 1000 hardware even if the oscillator is running at 16 MHz. I
will add some reasonable note to rtcan_dev.h
Is there any special reason for
Hi Wolfgang,
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> You have to define the real CAN system clock, which is 16/2 = 8 Mhz for
> most SJA 1000 hardware even if the oscillator is running at 16 MHz. I
> will add some reasonable note to rtcan_dev.h
Is there any special reason for this? Wouldn't it be more meaning
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
as one result of a hacking session on a PPC405 with SJA1000 on board I
applied two minor fixes to rtcan_isa.c to SVN, see end of mail for
reference. The first one gave an "interesting" effect on big-endian
because irq is an integer, the second one reveals that we s
