Re: [Xenomai-core] Scheduling while atomic

2006-01-30 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: ... [Update] While writing this mail and letting your test run for a while, I *did* get a hard lock-up. Hold on, digging deeper... And here are its last words, spoken via serial console: c31dfab0 0086 c30d1a90 c02a2500 c482a360 0001 0001

[Xenomai-core] Scheduling while atomic

2006-01-18 Thread Jeroen Van den Keybus
Hm. When I remove the output() from both tasks, all seems fine. Jeroen. ___ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomai-core@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core

Re: [Xenomai-core] Scheduling while atomic

2006-01-18 Thread Jeroen Van den Keybus
Hold on. Just crashed without the file access: please disregard last post. Jeroen. ___ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomai-core@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core

[Xenomai-core] Scheduling while atomic

2006-01-18 Thread Jeroen Van den Keybus
Gilles, I cannot reproduce those messages after turning nucleus debugging on. Instead, I now either get relatively more failing mutexes oreven hard lockups with the test program I sent to you. If thecomputer didn't crash, dmesg contains 3 Xenomai messages relating to a task being movend to

Re: [Xenomai-core] Scheduling while atomic

2006-01-18 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Jeroen Van den Keybus wrote: Gilles, I cannot reproduce those messages after turning nucleus debugging on. Instead, I now either get relatively more failing mutexes or even hard lockups with the test program I sent to you. If the computer didn't crash, dmesg contains 3 Xenomai

[Xenomai-core] Scheduling while atomic

2006-01-18 Thread Jeroen Van den Keybus
Hello, Apparently, the code I shared with Gilles never made it to this forum. Anyway, the issue I'm having here is really a problem and it might be useful if some of you could try it out or comment on it. I might be making a silly programming error here, but the result is invariably erroneous

Re: [Xenomai-core] Scheduling while atomic

2006-01-18 Thread Jan Kiszka
Jan Kiszka wrote: ... [Update] While writing this mail and letting your test run for a while, I *did* get a hard lock-up. Hold on, digging deeper... And here are its last words, spoken via serial console: c31dfab0 0086 c30d1a90 c02a2500 c482a360 0001 0001 0020

Re: [Xenomai-core] Scheduling while atomic

2006-01-18 Thread Jan Kiszka
Jan Kiszka wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: ... [Update] While writing this mail and letting your test run for a while, I *did* get a hard lock-up. Hold on, digging deeper... And here are its last words, spoken via serial console: c31dfab0 0086 c30d1a90 c02a2500 c482a360 0001 0001

Re: [Xenomai-core] Scheduling while atomic

2006-01-18 Thread Jan Kiszka
Jeroen Van den Keybus wrote: Interesting, when writing to 2 different files, I get the same crashes. Will test with only one task/fd. File ops doesn't matter for me. I took them out of task0/1, and I still got the crashes. (BTW, this may explain the difference in your backtrace you reported

Re: [Xenomai-core] Scheduling while atomic

2006-01-18 Thread Hannes Mayer
Jan Kiszka wrote: [...] Do you (or anybody else) have a running 2.0.x installation? If so, please test that setup as well. Sure :-) # uname -r 2.6.13.4-adeos-xenomai # cat /proc/xenomai/version 2.0 # ./mutex Running for 2.15 seconds. ALERT: No lock! (lockcnt=0) Offending task: task0 ALERT: No

Re: [Xenomai-core] Scheduling while atomic

2006-01-18 Thread Jeroen Van den Keybus
Hm. When I remove the output() from both tasks, all seems fine. Jeroen.