[Xenomai-core] Re: Xenomai on PPC

2005-11-28 Thread Philippe Gerum
Andrea Iudiciani wrote: Hi all, hi Paolo, I would like to know if is scheduled the porting of Xenomai to PPC-based platform and, if the answer is affermative, when. I'm very interested about that. best regards, It's already there:

Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] NMI-watchdog related fixes

2005-11-28 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi, some fixes related to warnings when you switch on Xenomai's NMI watchdog. Applied, thanks. Jan Index: include/asm-i386/system.h

Re: [Xenomai-core] Latest snapshot (182) not compiling (kernel)

2005-11-28 Thread Panagiotis Issaris
Hi,I'm also having issues compiling the latest Xenomai tree.On 11/25/05, Ignacio García Pérez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi,I dunno what's changed, but I updated my xenomai snapshot to the latest revision (182) and the kernel no longer compiles (fails due to somexnpod_* undefined symbols).Revision

Re: [Xenomai-core] Latest snapshot (182) not compiling (kernel)

2005-11-28 Thread Philippe Gerum
Panagiotis Issaris wrote: Hi, I'm also having issues compiling the latest Xenomai tree. Mm, dot-config would be great. TIA, On 11/25/05, *Ignacio García Pérez* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I dunno what's changed, but I updated my xenomai snapshot to

Re: [Xenomai-core] Latest snapshot (182) not compiling (kernel)

2005-11-28 Thread Panagiotis Issaris
Hi Jan,On 11/28/05, Jan Kiszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... reference to `__raw_read_unlock' kernel/built-in.o: In function `schedule_event': /usr/local/src/linux-2.6.14/kernel/xenomai/nucleus/shadow.c:152: undefined reference to `__raw_read_lock'

Re: [Xenomai-core] Latest snapshot (182) not compiling (kernel)

2005-11-28 Thread Panagiotis Issaris
Hi Philippe,On 11/28/05, Philippe Gerum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Panagiotis Issaris wrote: Hi, I'm also having issues compiling the latest Xenomai tree.Mm, dot-config would be great. TIA,Sorry :)The problem appears to be gone when disabling the interrupt shield. (An excerpt from my config can be

Re: [Xenomai-core] Latest snapshot (182) not compiling (kernel)

2005-11-28 Thread Philippe Gerum
Panagiotis Issaris wrote: Hi Philippe, On 11/28/05, *Philippe Gerum* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Panagiotis Issaris wrote: Hi, I'm also having issues compiling the latest Xenomai tree. Mm, dot-config would be great. TIA, Sorry :) The

[Xenomai-core] [RFC] latency tracing

2005-11-28 Thread Jan Kiszka
Hi, as I'm lazy, er busy, I'm pushing this idea into public instead of hacking a patch on my own: wouldn't it be nice to have something like the latency backtrace of PREEMPT_RT also in Xenomai? Even when the core is once optimised ;), there can still be drivers with long IRQ locks nuking the

Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC] latency tracing

2005-11-28 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi, as I'm lazy, er busy, I'm pushing this idea into public instead of hacking a patch on my own: wouldn't it be nice to have something like the latency backtrace of PREEMPT_RT also in Xenomai? Yes; we would had saved a lot of time with a precise debug instrumentation in

[Xenomai-core] [PATCH] NMI-watchdog related fixes

2005-11-28 Thread Jan Kiszka
Hi, some fixes related to warnings when you switch on Xenomai's NMI watchdog. Jan Index: include/asm-i386/system.h === --- include/asm-i386/system.h (Revision 191) +++ include/asm-i386/system.h (Arbeitskopie) @@ -602,9 +602,11 @@

[Xenomai-core] Re: Xenomai on PPC

2005-11-28 Thread Philippe Gerum
Andrea Iudiciani wrote: Hi all, hi Paolo, I would like to know if is scheduled the porting of Xenomai to PPC-based platform and, if the answer is affermative, when. I'm very interested about that. best regards, It's already there:

Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] NMI-watchdog related fixes

2005-11-28 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi, some fixes related to warnings when you switch on Xenomai's NMI watchdog. Applied, thanks. Jan Index: include/asm-i386/system.h

Re: [Xenomai-core] Latest snapshot (182) not compiling (kernel)

2005-11-28 Thread Panagiotis Issaris
Hi,I'm also having issues compiling the latest Xenomai tree.On 11/25/05, Ignacio García Pérez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi,I dunno what's changed, but I updated my xenomai snapshot to the latest revision (182) and the kernel no longer compiles (fails due to somexnpod_* undefined symbols).Revision

Re: [Xenomai-core] Latest snapshot (182) not compiling (kernel)

2005-11-28 Thread Jan Kiszka
Panagiotis Issaris wrote: Hi, I'm also having issues compiling the latest Xenomai tree. On 11/25/05, Ignacio García Pérez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I dunno what's changed, but I updated my xenomai snapshot to the latest revision (182) and the kernel no longer compiles (fails due

Re: [Xenomai-core] Latest snapshot (182) not compiling (kernel)

2005-11-28 Thread Philippe Gerum
Panagiotis Issaris wrote: Hi, I'm also having issues compiling the latest Xenomai tree. Mm, dot-config would be great. TIA, On 11/25/05, *Ignacio García Pérez* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I dunno what's changed, but I updated my xenomai snapshot to the

Re: [Xenomai-core] Latest snapshot (182) not compiling (kernel)

2005-11-28 Thread Panagiotis Issaris
Hi Jan,On 11/28/05, Jan Kiszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... reference to `__raw_read_unlock' kernel/built-in.o: In function `schedule_event': /usr/local/src/linux-2.6.14/kernel/xenomai/nucleus/shadow.c:152: undefined reference to `__raw_read_lock'

Re: [Xenomai-core] Latest snapshot (182) not compiling (kernel)

2005-11-28 Thread Panagiotis Issaris
Hi Philippe,On 11/28/05, Philippe Gerum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Panagiotis Issaris wrote: Hi, I'm also having issues compiling the latest Xenomai tree.Mm, dot-config would be great. TIA,Sorry :)The problem appears to be gone when disabling the interrupt shield. (An excerpt from my config can be

[Xenomai-core] [RFC] latency tracing

2005-11-28 Thread Jan Kiszka
Hi, as I'm lazy, er busy, I'm pushing this idea into public instead of hacking a patch on my own: wouldn't it be nice to have something like the latency backtrace of PREEMPT_RT also in Xenomai? Even when the core is once optimised ;), there can still be drivers with long IRQ locks nuking the

Re: [Xenomai-core] [RFC] latency tracing

2005-11-28 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi, as I'm lazy, er busy, I'm pushing this idea into public instead of hacking a patch on my own: wouldn't it be nice to have something like the latency backtrace of PREEMPT_RT also in Xenomai? Yes; we would had saved a lot of time with a precise debug instrumentation in