Re: [Adeos-main] Re: [Xenomai-core] I-pipe + latency tracing patch

2006-01-05 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: I've just rolled out two patches, the first issue of the 1.1 series for x86, and the accompanying tracer patch contributed by Jan Kiszka and Luotao Fu. With the

[Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] latency tracer update

2006-01-05 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi again, here comes the first update of the new latency tracer. arch/i386/kernel/entry.S | 27 +++ arch/i386/kernel/ipipe-root.c |4 include/asm-i386/system.h | 70 + include/linux/ipipe_trace.h |3 kernel/ipipe/Kconfig | 18 ++

Re: [Xenomai-core] heres a go at an adeos-ipipe-2.6.15-i386-1.1-01.patch

2006-01-05 Thread Philippe Gerum
Hi Jim, Jim Cromie wrote: hi Phillipe, everyone, happy 06 ! Bugfree 06? Nah, just kidding... Out of curiosity, I applied adeos-ipipe-2.6.14-i386-1.1-01.patch on top of 15. the rejects were small, and simple enough looking, that even a lazy sod like myself might manually fix them, so I

Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH, RFC] nucleus:shared irq and possible ipipe problem

2006-01-05 Thread Philippe Gerum
Dmitry Adamushko wrote: err... I have to orginize some issues next few days so I'll be out of my notebook. Then I'll finilize the ipipe-irq-related patch so to be ready for the .01 version. Meanwhile, I have finished merging the shared IRQ infrastructure into the Adeos codebase for all

[Xenomai-core] heres a go at an adeos-ipipe-2.6.15-i386-1.1-01.patch

2006-01-05 Thread Jim Cromie
hi Phillipe, everyone, happy 06 ! Out of curiosity, I applied adeos-ipipe-2.6.14-i386-1.1-01.patch on top of 15. the rejects were small, and simple enough looking, that even a lazy sod like myself might manually fix them, so I did. whats more, it built clean and booted ! I havent done

Re: [Adeos-main] Re: [Xenomai-core] I-pipe + latency tracing patch

2006-01-05 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: I've just rolled out two patches, the first issue of the 1.1 series for x86, and the accompanying tracer patch contributed by Jan Kiszka and Luotao Fu. With the

[Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] latency tracer update

2006-01-05 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi again, here comes the first update of the new latency tracer. arch/i386/kernel/entry.S | 27 +++ Is there any good reason to patch the callers of __ipipe_handle_irq instead of instrumenting the callee directly? arch/i386/kernel/ipipe-root.c |4

Re: [Xenomai-core] heres a go at an adeos-ipipe-2.6.15-i386-1.1-01.patch

2006-01-05 Thread Philippe Gerum
Hi Jim, Jim Cromie wrote: hi Phillipe, everyone, happy 06 ! Bugfree 06? Nah, just kidding... Out of curiosity, I applied adeos-ipipe-2.6.14-i386-1.1-01.patch on top of 15. the rejects were small, and simple enough looking, that even a lazy sod like myself might manually fix them, so I