Re: [Xenomai-core] [rfc] Building Linux kernel in Xenomai tree.

2006-01-08 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Philippe Gerum wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Hi, attached is a patch of Xenomai trunk build system to allow building Linux kernel as part of Xenomai build process. This way, typing make install builds and installs the Linux kernel, kernel modules and Xenomai. The

Re: [Xenomai-core] [rfc] Building Linux kernel in Xenomai tree.

2006-01-08 Thread Philippe Gerum
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Hi, attached is a patch of Xenomai trunk build system to allow building Linux kernel as part of Xenomai build process. This way, typing make install builds and installs the Linux kernel, kernel

Re: [Xenomai-core] Two patches for the documentation

2006-01-08 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Niklaus Giger wrote: xeno.patch is a shorter way how to cross-compile using the CROSS_COMPILE variable. The CROSS_COMPILE prefix is not used by the configure script of branch 2.1 of Xenomai (though it works with branch 2.0), the --host option of configure should be used instead. Also

Re: [Xenomai-core] latency kernel part crashes on ppc64

2006-01-08 Thread Jan Kiszka
Heikki Lindholm wrote: Hi, Some recent changes (*cough* RTDM benchmark driver *cough*) broke kernel mode benchmarking for ppc64. Previously klatency worked fine, but now latency -t 1 crashes somewhere in xnpod_schedule. Jan, any pending patches a comin'? Nope, it should work as it is. But

Re: [Xenomai-core] latency kernel part crashes on ppc64

2006-01-08 Thread Heikki Lindholm
Jan Kiszka kirjoitti: Heikki Lindholm wrote: Hi, Some recent changes (*cough* RTDM benchmark driver *cough*) broke kernel mode benchmarking for ppc64. Previously klatency worked fine, but now latency -t 1 crashes somewhere in xnpod_schedule. Jan, any pending patches a comin'? Nope, it

Re: [Xenomai-core] [rfc] Building Linux kernel in Xenomai tree.

2006-01-08 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Philippe Gerum wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: The current approach is to use the sources of the running kernel if the only option specified is --enable-linux-build. Do you mean you find this feature superfluous ? If $enableval is y, then no path has been specified, so you

Re: [Xenomai-core] latency kernel part crashes on ppc64

2006-01-08 Thread Jan Kiszka
Heikki Lindholm wrote: Jan Kiszka kirjoitti: Heikki Lindholm wrote: Hi, Some recent changes (*cough* RTDM benchmark driver *cough*) broke kernel mode benchmarking for ppc64. Previously klatency worked fine, but now latency -t 1 crashes somewhere in xnpod_schedule. Jan, any pending

Re: [Xenomai-core] latency kernel part crashes on ppc64

2006-01-08 Thread Heikki Lindholm
Jan Kiszka kirjoitti: Heikki Lindholm wrote: Jan Kiszka kirjoitti: Heikki Lindholm wrote: Hi, Some recent changes (*cough* RTDM benchmark driver *cough*) broke kernel mode benchmarking for ppc64. Previously klatency worked fine, but now latency -t 1 crashes somewhere in xnpod_schedule.

Re: [Xenomai-core] latency kernel part crashes on ppc64

2006-01-08 Thread Jan Kiszka
Heikki Lindholm wrote: Jan Kiszka kirjoitti: Heikki Lindholm wrote: Jan Kiszka kirjoitti: Heikki Lindholm wrote: Hi, Some recent changes (*cough* RTDM benchmark driver *cough*) broke kernel mode benchmarking for ppc64. Previously klatency worked fine, but now latency -t 1 crashes

Re: [Xenomai-core] latency kernel part crashes on ppc64

2006-01-08 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Heikki Lindholm wrote: o When and how does it crash? At start-up immediately? Or after a while? I inserted some serial debug prints and it gets two passes to eval_outer_loop done (enter/exit function). After that it freezes. Without the debug printing it dies with kernel

Re: [Xenomai-core] [rfc] Building Linux kernel in Xenomai tree.

2006-01-08 Thread Philippe Gerum
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: The current approach is to use the sources of the running kernel if the only option specified is --enable-linux-build. Do you mean you find this feature superfluous ? If $enableval is y, then no

Re: [Xenomai-core] [rfc] Building Linux kernel in Xenomai tree.

2006-01-08 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Philippe Gerum wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: The current approach is to use the sources of the running kernel if the only option specified is --enable-linux-build. Do you mean you find this feature

Re: [Xenomai-core] latency kernel part crashes on ppc64

2006-01-08 Thread Stelian Pop
Le dimanche 08 janvier 2006 à 18:56 +0200, Heikki Lindholm a écrit : Some recent changes (*cough* RTDM benchmark driver *cough*) broke kernel mode benchmarking for ppc64. Previously klatency worked fine, but now latency -t 1 crashes somewhere in xnpod_schedule. Jan, any pending patches a

Re: [Xenomai-core] [rfc] Building Linux kernel in Xenomai tree.

2006-01-08 Thread Philippe Gerum
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: The current approach is to use the sources of the running kernel if the only option specified is --enable-linux-build. Do you mean you find this

[Xenomai-core] [PATCH] fix tracer compilation issues

2006-01-08 Thread Jan Kiszka
Hi Philippe, two minor updates I fixed since your last merge. The first one triggers if the tracer tries to warn of debugging switch related latencies. The second one when building very specific out-of-tree modules against the kernel (here: madwifi with its binary-only component), stumbling over

Re: [Xenomai-core] latency kernel part crashes on ppc64

2006-01-08 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Stelian Pop wrote: Le dimanche 08 janvier 2006 à 18:56 +0200, Heikki Lindholm a écrit : Some recent changes (*cough* RTDM benchmark driver *cough*) broke kernel mode benchmarking for ppc64. Previously klatency worked fine, but now latency -t 1 crashes somewhere in

Re: [Xenomai-core] heres a go at an adeos-ipipe-2.6.15-i386-1.1-01.patch

2006-01-08 Thread Philippe Gerum
Philippe Gerum wrote: Jim Cromie wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: You may want to try this one: http://download.gna.org/adeos/patches/v2.6/i386/adeos-ipipe-2.6.15-i386-1.1-03.patch although Im not surprised, I feel like telling someone, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a Linux

Re: [Xenomai-core] Two patches for the documentation

2006-01-08 Thread Philippe Gerum
Niklaus Giger wrote: Hi xeno.sim.patch contains some clarification on how to build the xenoscope. (GCC 3.4 worked for me on a x86 system, but with a lot of warnings, that fwritable is deprecated) xeno.patch is a shorter way how to cross-compile using the CROSS_COMPILE variable. It worked

Re: [Xenomai-core] [rfc] Building Linux kernel in Xenomai tree.

2006-01-08 Thread Philippe Gerum
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Hi, attached is a patch of Xenomai trunk build system to allow building Linux kernel as part of Xenomai build process. This way, typing make install builds and installs the Linux kernel, kernel modules and Xenomai. The patch is a bit young and still has a few

Re: [Xenomai-core] [rfc] Building Linux kernel in Xenomai tree.

2006-01-08 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Philippe Gerum wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Hi, attached is a patch of Xenomai trunk build system to allow building Linux kernel as part of Xenomai build process. This way, typing make install builds and installs the Linux kernel, kernel modules and Xenomai. The

Re: [Xenomai-core] [rfc] Building Linux kernel in Xenomai tree.

2006-01-08 Thread Philippe Gerum
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Hi, attached is a patch of Xenomai trunk build system to allow building Linux kernel as part of Xenomai build process. This way, typing make install builds and installs the Linux kernel, kernel

Re: [Xenomai-core] Two patches for the documentation

2006-01-08 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Niklaus Giger wrote: xeno.patch is a shorter way how to cross-compile using the CROSS_COMPILE variable. The CROSS_COMPILE prefix is not used by the configure script of branch 2.1 of Xenomai (though it works with branch 2.0), the --host option of configure should be used instead. Also

[Xenomai-core] rt_task_spawn with NULL name and pascal linking

2006-01-08 Thread Stefan Kisdaroczi
Hi, I needed a lot coffee and tobacco resources to find out that rt_task_spawn with NULL name will not work in userspace. The call failed with -3 (ESRCH?). This error seems not documented the xenomai api documention. Using rt_task_create and rt_task_start it was rt_task_start that failed. I

Re: [Xenomai-core] latency kernel part crashes on ppc64

2006-01-08 Thread Jan Kiszka
Heikki Lindholm wrote: Hi, Some recent changes (*cough* RTDM benchmark driver *cough*) broke kernel mode benchmarking for ppc64. Previously klatency worked fine, but now latency -t 1 crashes somewhere in xnpod_schedule. Jan, any pending patches a comin'? Nope, it should work as it is. But

Re: [Xenomai-core] [rfc] Building Linux kernel in Xenomai tree.

2006-01-08 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Philippe Gerum wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: The current approach is to use the sources of the running kernel if the only option specified is --enable-linux-build. Do you mean you find this feature superfluous ? If $enableval is y, then no path has been specified, so you

Re: [Xenomai-core] latency kernel part crashes on ppc64

2006-01-08 Thread Heikki Lindholm
Jan Kiszka kirjoitti: Heikki Lindholm wrote: Hi, Some recent changes (*cough* RTDM benchmark driver *cough*) broke kernel mode benchmarking for ppc64. Previously klatency worked fine, but now latency -t 1 crashes somewhere in xnpod_schedule. Jan, any pending patches a comin'? Nope, it

Re: [Xenomai-core] latency kernel part crashes on ppc64

2006-01-08 Thread Jan Kiszka
Heikki Lindholm wrote: Jan Kiszka kirjoitti: Heikki Lindholm wrote: Hi, Some recent changes (*cough* RTDM benchmark driver *cough*) broke kernel mode benchmarking for ppc64. Previously klatency worked fine, but now latency -t 1 crashes somewhere in xnpod_schedule. Jan, any pending

Re: [Xenomai-core] latency kernel part crashes on ppc64

2006-01-08 Thread Heikki Lindholm
Jan Kiszka kirjoitti: Heikki Lindholm wrote: Jan Kiszka kirjoitti: Heikki Lindholm wrote: Hi, Some recent changes (*cough* RTDM benchmark driver *cough*) broke kernel mode benchmarking for ppc64. Previously klatency worked fine, but now latency -t 1 crashes somewhere in xnpod_schedule.

Re: [Xenomai-core] latency kernel part crashes on ppc64

2006-01-08 Thread Heikki Lindholm
Jan Kiszka kirjoitti: Heikki Lindholm wrote: Jan Kiszka kirjoitti: Heikki Lindholm wrote: Hi, Some recent changes (*cough* RTDM benchmark driver *cough*) broke kernel mode benchmarking for ppc64. Previously klatency worked fine, but now latency -t 1 crashes somewhere in xnpod_schedule.

Re: [Xenomai-core] latency kernel part crashes on ppc64

2006-01-08 Thread Jan Kiszka
Heikki Lindholm wrote: Jan Kiszka kirjoitti: Heikki Lindholm wrote: Jan Kiszka kirjoitti: Heikki Lindholm wrote: Hi, Some recent changes (*cough* RTDM benchmark driver *cough*) broke kernel mode benchmarking for ppc64. Previously klatency worked fine, but now latency -t 1 crashes

Re: [Xenomai-core] [rfc] Building Linux kernel in Xenomai tree.

2006-01-08 Thread Philippe Gerum
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: The current approach is to use the sources of the running kernel if the only option specified is --enable-linux-build. Do you mean you find this feature superfluous ? If $enableval is y, then no

Re: [Xenomai-core] latency kernel part crashes on ppc64

2006-01-08 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Heikki Lindholm wrote: o When and how does it crash? At start-up immediately? Or after a while? I inserted some serial debug prints and it gets two passes to eval_outer_loop done (enter/exit function). After that it freezes. Without the debug printing it dies with kernel

Re: [Xenomai-core] [rfc] Building Linux kernel in Xenomai tree.

2006-01-08 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Philippe Gerum wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: The current approach is to use the sources of the running kernel if the only option specified is --enable-linux-build. Do you mean you find this feature

Re: [Xenomai-core] latency kernel part crashes on ppc64

2006-01-08 Thread Stelian Pop
Le dimanche 08 janvier 2006 à 18:56 +0200, Heikki Lindholm a écrit : Some recent changes (*cough* RTDM benchmark driver *cough*) broke kernel mode benchmarking for ppc64. Previously klatency worked fine, but now latency -t 1 crashes somewhere in xnpod_schedule. Jan, any pending patches a

Re: [Xenomai-core] [rfc] Building Linux kernel in Xenomai tree.

2006-01-08 Thread Philippe Gerum
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: The current approach is to use the sources of the running kernel if the only option specified is --enable-linux-build. Do you mean you find this

Re: [Xenomai-core] latency kernel part crashes on ppc64

2006-01-08 Thread Jan Kiszka
Stelian Pop wrote: Le dimanche 08 janvier 2006 à 18:56 +0200, Heikki Lindholm a écrit : Some recent changes (*cough* RTDM benchmark driver *cough*) broke kernel mode benchmarking for ppc64. Previously klatency worked fine, but now latency -t 1 crashes somewhere in xnpod_schedule. Jan, any

[Xenomai-core] [PATCH] fix tracer compilation issues

2006-01-08 Thread Jan Kiszka
Hi Philippe, two minor updates I fixed since your last merge. The first one triggers if the tracer tries to warn of debugging switch related latencies. The second one when building very specific out-of-tree modules against the kernel (here: madwifi with its binary-only component), stumbling over