Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Likely not this time (keep it cold anyway, who knows); I strongly suspect a bug in
xnarch_switch_to() for all archs but x86
Now that you are talking about it, I may be the one who owes a beer to
everyone by first having put a bug in ia64
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Likely not this time (keep it cold anyway, who knows); I strongly suspect a bug in
xnarch_switch_to() for all archs but x86
Now that you are talking about it, I may be the one who owes a beer to
everyone by first having put a bug in ia64
On 09/01/06, Gilles Chanteperdrix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm presenting it one last time as a draft, so it's a right time to give
all
the remarks concerning design/implementation issues for all interested
parties.
Any feedback is
On 09/01/06, Jan Kiszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My mail client unfortunately refused to inline your patches, so I have to:
--- intr-cvs.c 2005-12-02 19:56:20.0 +0100
+++ intr.c 2006-01-09 21:26:44.0 +0100
[...]
@@ -204,11 +242,66 @@
int xnintr_attach (xnintr_t
