Re: [Xenomai-core] Missing IRQ end function on PowerPC

2006-02-02 Thread Philippe Gerum
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Therefore we need a dedicated function to re-enable interrupts in the ISR. We could name it *_end_irq, but maybe *_enable_isr_irq is more obvious. On non-PPC archs it would translate to *_irq_enable. I

Re: [Xenomai-core] [Combo-PATCH] Shared interrupts (base, /proc support, edge-triggered stuff)

2006-02-02 Thread Jan Kiszka
Dmitry Adamushko wrote: Hi there, as I promised, here go the following patches (ordered as they have to be applied one by one) : 1) shirq-base.patch Adds the name field to the interrupt object of the nucleus layer. Reworks the related bits of the native skin (+ a few minor changes

Re: [Xenomai-core] [Combo-PATCH] Shared interrupts (base, /proc support, edge-triggered stuff)

2006-02-02 Thread Dmitry Adamushko
On 02/02/06, Jan Kiszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dmitry Adamushko wrote: Hi there, as I promised, here go the following patches (ordered as they have to be applied one by one) : 1) shirq-base.patch Adds the name field to the interrupt object of the nucleus layer. Reworks the related bits of the

[Xenomai-core] some results on my laptop

2006-02-02 Thread Jim Cromie
some random sucesses .. Ive been running an ipipe kernel as the default since shortly after 1/7. Since then, Ive had a couple of freezes on boot, and sometimes bash's auto-complete takes longer to complete, but other than that, things have been solid. But that kernel wasnt configured using