[Xenomai-core] [BUG] deleting a T_SUSP'ed native task

2006-02-04 Thread Jan Kiszka
Hi Gilles, were you able to successfully run my T_SUSP test-case after the latest changes? For me this code still causes fatal exceptions: #include stdio.h #include sys/mman.h #include native/task.h void func(void *arg) { printf(you should not see this\n); rt_task_suspend(NULL); } int

[Xenomai-core] xeno_panic_trace-v2

2006-02-04 Thread Jan Kiszka
Hi Philippe, now I finally found the bug in my first version of this patch: some UVM skin builds complained about an unknown symbol. Fixed now in this version, please apply. Jan Index: include/asm-uvm/system.h === ---

Re: [Xenomai-core] xeno_panic_trace-v2

2006-02-04 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi Philippe, now I finally found the bug in my first version of this patch: some UVM skin builds complained about an unknown symbol. Fixed now in this version, please apply. Applied, thanks. Jan

[Xenomai-core] [PATCH] SMI-doc improvement / RTDM paper

2006-02-04 Thread Jan Kiszka
Hi Philippe, this patch tries to clarify where to solve SMI-related latencies. Or should we even mention the kconfig path? Moreover, I would like to upload my RTL-Workshop paper about RTDM to doc/nodist/pdf (~150k) so that it later makes it on the website as well. Ok? Jan Index:

[Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] SMI-doc improvement / RTDM paper

2006-02-04 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi Philippe, this patch tries to clarify where to solve SMI-related latencies. Or should we even mention the kconfig path? The name of the config switch involved should be enough, I guess. Moreover, I would like to upload my RTL-Workshop paper about RTDM to doc/nodist/pdf

Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] SMI-doc improvement / RTDM paper

2006-02-04 Thread Hannes Mayer
Hi all! Jan Kiszka wrote: [...] +printk(Xenomai: Intel chipset found but SMI workaround not enabled in kernel\n +configuration. You may encounter high interrupt latencies.\n); Speaking of printk. Since 2.1 I don't see any messages in the kernel log. I bet there is a

Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] SMI-doc improvement / RTDM paper

2006-02-04 Thread Philippe Gerum
Hannes Mayer wrote: Hi all! Jan Kiszka wrote: [...] +printk(Xenomai: Intel chipset found but SMI workaround not enabled in kernel\n +configuration. You may encounter high interrupt latencies.\n); Speaking of printk. Since 2.1 I don't see any messages in the kernel

Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] SMI-doc improvement / RTDM paper

2006-02-04 Thread Hannes Mayer
Philippe Gerum wrote: [...] dmesg | grep -i xenomai: ? Yeah, got it now! Sorry for the silly question! I forgot that as of 2.1 everything is compiled into the kernel by default, so when running a testsuite example there are no messages that xeno is loaded or unloaded. Thanks and best

Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] SMI-doc improvement / RTDM paper

2006-02-04 Thread Jan Kiszka
Philippe Gerum wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi Philippe, this patch tries to clarify where to solve SMI-related latencies. Or should we even mention the kconfig path? The name of the config switch involved should be enough, I guess. What about this? Please apply if it's ok. Jan Index:

Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] SMI-doc improvement / RTDM paper

2006-02-04 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi Philippe, this patch tries to clarify where to solve SMI-related latencies. Or should we even mention the kconfig path? The name of the config switch involved should be enough, I guess. What about this? Please apply if it's

[Xenomai-core] [BUG] deleting a T_SUSP'ed native task

2006-02-04 Thread Jan Kiszka
Hi Gilles, were you able to successfully run my T_SUSP test-case after the latest changes? For me this code still causes fatal exceptions: #include stdio.h #include sys/mman.h #include native/task.h void func(void *arg) { printf(you should not see this\n); rt_task_suspend(NULL); } int

Re: [Xenomai-core] broken docs

2006-02-04 Thread Jan Kiszka
Jan Kiszka wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: ROSSIER Daniel wrote: Dear Xenomai workers, Would it be possible to have an updated API documentation for Xenomai 2.0.x ? (I mean with formal parameters in function prototypes) I tried to regenerate it

[Xenomai-core] xeno_panic_trace-v2

2006-02-04 Thread Jan Kiszka
Hi Philippe, now I finally found the bug in my first version of this patch: some UVM skin builds complained about an unknown symbol. Fixed now in this version, please apply. Jan Index: include/asm-uvm/system.h === ---

Re: [Xenomai-core] xeno_panic_trace-v2

2006-02-04 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi Philippe, now I finally found the bug in my first version of this patch: some UVM skin builds complained about an unknown symbol. Fixed now in this version, please apply. Applied, thanks. Jan

[Xenomai-core] [PATCH] SMI-doc improvement / RTDM paper

2006-02-04 Thread Jan Kiszka
Hi Philippe, this patch tries to clarify where to solve SMI-related latencies. Or should we even mention the kconfig path? Moreover, I would like to upload my RTL-Workshop paper about RTDM to doc/nodist/pdf (~150k) so that it later makes it on the website as well. Ok? Jan Index:

Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] SMI-doc improvement / RTDM paper

2006-02-04 Thread Hannes Mayer
Hi all! Jan Kiszka wrote: [...] +printk(Xenomai: Intel chipset found but SMI workaround not enabled in kernel\n +configuration. You may encounter high interrupt latencies.\n); Speaking of printk. Since 2.1 I don't see any messages in the kernel log. I bet there is a

Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] SMI-doc improvement / RTDM paper

2006-02-04 Thread Philippe Gerum
Hannes Mayer wrote: Hi all! Jan Kiszka wrote: [...] +printk(Xenomai: Intel chipset found but SMI workaround not enabled in kernel\n +configuration. You may encounter high interrupt latencies.\n); Speaking of printk. Since 2.1 I don't see any messages in the kernel

Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] SMI-doc improvement / RTDM paper

2006-02-04 Thread Hannes Mayer
Philippe Gerum wrote: [...] dmesg | grep -i xenomai: ? Yeah, got it now! Sorry for the silly question! I forgot that as of 2.1 everything is compiled into the kernel by default, so when running a testsuite example there are no messages that xeno is loaded or unloaded. Thanks and best

Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] SMI-doc improvement / RTDM paper

2006-02-04 Thread Jan Kiszka
Philippe Gerum wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi Philippe, this patch tries to clarify where to solve SMI-related latencies. Or should we even mention the kconfig path? The name of the config switch involved should be enough, I guess. What about this? Please apply if it's ok. Jan Index:

Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] SMI-doc improvement / RTDM paper

2006-02-04 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Philippe Gerum wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi Philippe, this patch tries to clarify where to solve SMI-related latencies. Or should we even mention the kconfig path? The name of the config switch involved should be enough, I guess. What about this? Please apply if it's