Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] Shared interrupts (ready to merge)

2006-02-23 Thread Philippe Gerum
Dmitry Adamushko wrote: For RTDM I'm now almost determined to rework the API in way that only HANDLED/UNHANDLED (or what ever their names will be) get exported, any additional guru features will remain excluded as long as we have no clean usage policy for them. Good. Then let's go for

[Xenomai-core] Xenomai patch packaging concerns

2006-02-23 Thread Romain Lenglet
Hi, I understand that the prepare-kernel.sh script is a kind of smart patch program. It is very nice, but for packaging for Debian we need a real diff file. So I am currently modifying prepare-kernel.sh to be even smarter, so that it can optionally generate a diff file instead of actually

Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] Shared interrupts (ready to merge)

2006-02-23 Thread Philippe Gerum
Dmitry Adamushko wrote: For RTDM I'm now almost determined to rework the API in way that only HANDLED/UNHANDLED (or what ever their names will be) get exported, any additional guru features will remain excluded as long as we have no clean usage policy for them. Good. Then let's go for

Re: [Xenomai-core] Xenomai patch packaging concerns

2006-02-23 Thread Philippe Gerum
Romain Lenglet wrote: Hi, I understand that the prepare-kernel.sh script is a kind of smart patch program. It is very nice, but for packaging for Debian we need a real diff file. So I am currently modifying prepare-kernel.sh to be even smarter, so that it can optionally generate a diff