[Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] Shared interrupts (yet another movie :)

On 28/02/06, Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dmitry Adamushko wrote:> ...> Ok, are there any objections as to the current patch? If no, please apply.>Oops, I found a minor problem:make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/xenomai/build/doc/doxygen' doxygen/usr/src/xenomai/ksrc/skins/native/intr.c

Re: [Xenomai-core] C++ Support for VxWorks Skin of Xenomai?

Wu, John wrote: > We at Xerox El Segundo, Calif are new user of VxWork Skin of Xenomai. > We successfully brought up VxWork skin of xenomai 2.0.1on x86 platform > and ran VxWork test program in C. > > The question we have is how to build and compile the VxWork skin of > xenomai to support C++ co

[Xenomai-core] Re: [Xenomai-help] negative values of latency/klatency

Jan Kiszka wrote: > Rudolf Marek wrote: >> ... >> RTT| 00:00:01 >> RTH|klat min|klat avg|klat max| overrun|---klat best|--klat worst >> RTD|4767|4929| 15191| 0|4767| 15191 >> RTD|4767|4808|8282| 0|4767|

[Xenomai-core] Re: [Xenomai-help] negative values of latency/klatency

Jan Kiszka wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Rudolf Marek wrote: ... RTT| 00:00:01 RTH|klat min|klat avg|klat max| overrun|---klat best|--klat worst RTD|4767|4929| 15191| 0|4767| 15191 RTD|4767|4808|8282| 0|47

[Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] Shared interrupts (yet another movie :)

Dmitry Adamushko wrote: On 28/02/06, *Jan Kiszka* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Dmitry Adamushko wrote: > ... > Ok, are there any objections as to the current patch? If no, please apply. > Oops, I found a minor problem: make[2]: Enterin

[Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] Shared interrupts (yet another movie :)

Dmitry Adamushko wrote: Hi there, I have explicitly cc'ed Gilles as this patch affects the posix skin. In the light of the recent discussions, the AUTOENA flag has been converted to NOAUTOENA and the IRQ line is re-enabled on return from xnintr_irq_handler() and shirq brothers by default. A

[Xenomai-core] Re: [Xenomai-help] rt_task_wait_period() and overruns

Philippe Gerum wrote: Steven Seeger wrote: All right, all right. I surrender. *waves the white flag* Let's just say that I saw something different from fusion/classic RTAI and was reporting it as a possible bug incorrectly, all right? Right (except that fusion never exhibited the behaviou

[Xenomai-core] rt_task_wait_period() and overruns

Steven Seeger wrote: All right, all right. I surrender. *waves the white flag* Let's just say that I saw something different from fusion/classic RTAI and was reporting it as a possible bug incorrectly, all right? Right (except that fusion never exhibited the behaviour you described, though).

[Xenomai-core] Re: [Xenomai-help] rt_task_wait_period() and overruns

I do not recall having this problem with fusion, but I'll take your word on it. I don't have time to go back and check. :) Purging the overrun count when rt_task_wait_period() is called may work but not for all conditions. For example, say I am monitoring a patient's heartbeat by taking an A/D rea

Re: [Xenomai-core] 16550 compile err: ?RTDM_ IRQ_ENABLE? undeclared (first use in thi s function)

Jim Cromie wrote: > LD drivers/xenomai/16550A/built-in.o > CC [M] drivers/xenomai/16550A/16550A.o > /mnt/dilbert/jimc/dilbert/lxbuild/linux-2.6.15.1-ipipe-121/drivers/xenomai/16550A/16550A.c: > In function ?rt_16550_interrupt?: > /mnt/dilbert/jimc/dilbert/lxbuild/linux-2.6.15.1-ipipe-121/dr

[Xenomai-core] 16550 compile err: ‘RTDM_IRQ_ENABLE’ und eclared (first use in this function)

LD drivers/xenomai/16550A/built-in.o CC [M] drivers/xenomai/16550A/16550A.o /mnt/dilbert/jimc/dilbert/lxbuild/linux-2.6.15.1-ipipe-121/drivers/xenomai/16550A/16550A.c: In function ‘rt_16550_interrupt’: /mnt/dilbert/jimc/dilbert/lxbuild/linux-2.6.15.1-ipipe-121/drivers/xenomai/16550A/16550