[Xenomai-core] RE : New patch for Freescale i.MX21 (csb535fs)

2006-06-10 Thread ROSSIER Daniel
Hi Philippe, We have performed some test with the patch and everything is OK. We got the same latencies than before; we're now investigating what is the cause of some occasional peaks to 40-50 us. Daniel Message d'origine De: Philippe Gerum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: lun

[Xenomai-core] [PATCH] Add fptest for powerpc

2006-06-10 Thread Heikki Lindholm
This adds powerpc version of fptest.h. It just stores and loads the raw integer into/from FPU registers without converting to proper IEEE form. Converting would have added unneccessary complexity. As a side note, the ppc barfs on the test with "1000 != 10". :I -- hl diff -Nru xenomai.orig/incl

[Xenomai-core] [PATCH] fix breakage by #1185

2006-06-10 Thread Jan Kiszka
Hi, I guess this is more like what check-in #1185 wanted to achieve: --- src/skins/vrtx/task.c (Revision 1186) +++ src/skins/vrtx/task.c (Arbeitskopie) @@ -247,5 +247,6 @@ void sc_unlock (void) void sc_delay (long timeout) { XENOMAI_SKINCALL1(__vrtx_muxid, -

Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] Add fptest for powerpc

2006-06-10 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Heikki Lindholm wrote: > This adds powerpc version of fptest.h. It just stores and loads the raw > integer into/from FPU registers without converting to proper IEEE form. > Converting would have added unneccessary complexity. As a side note, the > ppc barfs on the test with "1000 != 10". :I

[Xenomai-core] Revision 1182 broke compiling PPC

2006-06-10 Thread Niklaus Giger
Hi Philippe Your change seems to be broken (at least on PPC). In http://ngiger.dyndns.org/buildbot/hcu3/builds/71/step-mk_xeno/0 you will notice near the end gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../../../build/xenomai/src/skins/vrtx -I../../../src/include -O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_REENTRANT -D__XENO__ -

Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] Add fptest for powerpc

2006-06-10 Thread Heikki Lindholm
Gilles Chanteperdrix kirjoitti: Heikki Lindholm wrote: > This adds powerpc version of fptest.h. It just stores and loads the raw > integer into/from FPU registers without converting to proper IEEE form. > Converting would have added unneccessary complexity. As a side note, the > ppc barfs

Re: [Xenomai-core] Revision 1182 broke compiling PPC

2006-06-10 Thread Philippe Gerum
Niklaus Giger wrote: Hi Philippe Your change seems to be broken (at least on PPC). In http://ngiger.dyndns.org/buildbot/hcu3/builds/71/step-mk_xeno/0 you will notice near the end gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../../../build/xenomai/src/skins/vrtx -I../../../src/include -O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE -D

Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] fix breakage by #1185

2006-06-10 Thread Philippe Gerum
Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi, I guess this is more like what check-in #1185 wanted to achieve: --- src/skins/vrtx/task.c (Revision 1186) +++ src/skins/vrtx/task.c (Arbeitskopie) @@ -247,5 +247,6 @@ void sc_unlock (void) void sc_delay (long timeout) { XENOMAI_SKINCALL1(__vrtx_muxid, -

[Xenomai-core] Re: [PATCH] kgdb/x86 over I-pipe

2006-06-10 Thread Jan Kiszka
Philippe Gerum wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Philippe Gerum wrote: >> >>> Hi Jan, >>> >>> Based on your previous work, here is a set of patches coupling KGDB and >>> the I-pipe. Basically, I've attempted to shrink the extra patches needed >>> against the original KGDB + I-pipe ones to the bare mini