Re: [Xenomai-core] [BUG] module usage counter of xenomai native corrupted (version 2.2.0 and 2.2.5)

2006-12-08 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Jan Kiszka wrote: Thomas Wiedemann wrote: Hi, there seems to be a bug in rt_task_create(). When no more memory is available, the module usage counter of xeno_native is decremented. I guess it is not incremented before, however, so the counter gets 0 and wraps then to a negative number. It is

Re: [Xenomai-core] [BUG] module usage counter of xenomai native corrupted (version 2.2.0 and 2.2.5)

2006-12-08 Thread Jan Kiszka
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Thomas Wiedemann wrote: Hi, there seems to be a bug in rt_task_create(). When no more memory is available, the module usage counter of xeno_native is decremented. I guess it is not incremented before, however, so

Re: [Xenomai-core] Buildbot: Failure building Xenomai kernel for TQM860

2006-12-08 Thread Jan Kiszka
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Hi Niklaus, I just compiled my Linux 2.4 kernel for TQM860L with the latest revision of Xenomai and I cannot reproduce your problem. In you linker path there are no Xenomai objects. How does it come? Do you use --arch=ppc with prepare_kernel (--arch=powerpc is not

Re: [Xenomai-core] Buildbot: Failure building Xenomai kernel for TQM860

2006-12-08 Thread Niklaus Giger
Am Freitag, 8. Dezember 2006 13:40 schrieb Wolfgang Grandegger: Hi Niklaus, I just compiled my Linux 2.4 kernel for TQM860L with the latest revision of Xenomai and I cannot reproduce your problem. In you linker path there are no Xenomai objects. How does it come? Do you use --arch=ppc with

Re: [Xenomai-core] [BUG] module usage counter of xenomai native corrupted (version 2.2.0 and 2.2.5)

2006-12-08 Thread Jan Kiszka
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Thomas Wiedemann wrote: Hi, there seems to be a bug in rt_task_create(). When no more memory is available, the module usage counter of xeno_native is decremented.

[Xenomai-core] Re: [Adeos-main] Differences between IPIPE v1.5 and v1.6

2006-12-08 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 10:59 +0100, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: Hi Philippe, what are the major differences between the ADEOS-IPIPE patch versions v1.5 and v1.6, apart from support for the new genirq layer. I realized, that the arch specific files ipipe-core.c and ipipe-root.c have been

Re: [Xenomai-core] Re: [patch] memory barriers in intr.c :: xnintr_lock/unlock()

2006-12-08 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 00:03 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote: Dmitry Adamushko wrote: Hello, following the recent discussion with Jan, here is a patch that aims at allowing xnintr_lock/unlock actually do what they were supposed to do in the first instance. [...] ---

Re: [Xenomai-core] [BUG] module usage counter of xenomai native corrupted (version 2.2.0 and 2.2.5)

2006-12-08 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Jan Kiszka wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Index: ksrc/nucleus/shadow.c === --- ksrc/nucleus/shadow.c (révision 1930) +++ ksrc/nucleus/shadow.c (copie de travail) @@ -888,6 +888,9 @@ p =