> Here come some patches that add the following functions to the pSOS
direct
> syscall interface: tm_wkafter, tm_cancel, tm_evafter, tm_get, tm_set
Yesterdays patches again in a different format that now (hopefully) can be
applied automatically.
> - I'm still looking for a suitable place for
On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 18:13 +0100, Thomas Necker wrote:
> > Here come some patches that add the following functions to the pSOS
> direct
> > syscall interface: tm_wkafter, tm_cancel, tm_evafter, tm_get, tm_set
>
> Yesterdays patches again in a different format that now (hopefully) can be
> ap
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 09:49 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> reading through the I-pipe patch I noticed that there are quite a few
> spin_lock->spin_lock_hw and similar conversions. Having the conversion
> mechanism of the -rt patch in mind, I wrote the attached I-pipe cleanup
> that applies a s
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 18:30 +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> at the risk of overseeing some valid use case, I'm proposing to get rid
> of the hard rw-spinlocks in both Xenomai and I-pipe. Find attached
> patches to convert the only user, the IRQ shield, to a spinlock and
> remove the related wra
On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 18:13 +0100, Thomas Necker wrote:
> > Here come some patches that add the following functions to the pSOS
> direct
> > syscall interface: tm_wkafter, tm_cancel, tm_evafter, tm_get, tm_set
The user-space part looks fine. There are a few issues in the syscall
wrappers, I'm
