On 22/06/07, Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ ... ]
>
> Only compile-tested under various .configs. Any comment welcome.
>
> @@ -76,7 +102,7 @@ static inline void xnintr_stat_counter_d
> static void xnintr_irq_handler(unsigned irq, void *cookie)
> {
> xnsched_t *sched = xnpod_cu
Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
>> On 21/06/07, Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ .. ]
surprise-surprise.. sure, one way or another it must be fixed. heh..
too many bugs (and I don't even want to say who's responsible) :-/
>>> I wouldn't accept all the responsibilit
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
> On 22/06/07, Jan Kiszka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [ ... ]
>>
>> Only compile-tested under various .configs. Any comment welcome.
>>
>
>> @@ -76,7 +102,7 @@ static inline void xnintr_stat_counter_d
>> static void xnintr_irq_handler(unsigned irq, void *cookie)
>> {
>>
Currently, the patch election algorithm does not take the kernel
sub-level version into account, thus one gets offered 2.6.20, although
the kernel is 2.6.19. This patch fixes it.
Should go into 2.3.x as well.
Index: xenomai/scripts/prepare-kernel.sh
This helps to run prepare-kernel with less explicit switches from
automatic build scripts. It adds the "--default" parameter which
virtually presses when the user used to be asked for some decision.
Would be nice to have in 2.3.x as well.
Index: xenomai/scripts/prepare-kernel.sh
=
BOUIN Alexandre wrote:
> Same tests but for AT91SAM9263-EK board :
> - one under DD load, latency set to 45µs
> - another one under Calibrator load, latency set to 30µs
> - and the last under Test_switch load, latency set to 45µs
> Xeno-test traces are available and the end of this mail.
>
> W
BOUIN Alexandre wrote:
> Same tests but for AT91SAM9263-EK board :
> - one under DD load, latency set to 45µs
> - another one under Calibrator load, latency set to 30µs
> - and the last under Test_switch load, latency set to 45µs
> Xeno-test traces are available and the end of this mail.
