[Xenomai-core] Group-based RT caps (was: [Xenomai-help] Xenomai and mlockall)

2007-06-26 Thread Jan Kiszka
Hi, I'm moving this thread to xenomai-core as I have some implementation idea... Fillod Stephane wrote: ... I think Johan was not asking to disable the mlockall, but to allow some. non-root user to be able to do it. He found his solution anyway, which is worth an entry in the FAQ. Since

Re: [Xenomai-core] [Xenomai-help] Group-based RT caps

2007-06-26 Thread Jan Kiszka
Jan Kiszka wrote: Hi, I'm moving this thread to xenomai-core as I have some implementation idea... Fillod Stephane wrote: ... I think Johan was not asking to disable the mlockall, but to allow some. non-root user to be able to do it. He found his solution anyway, which is worth an entry

Re: [Xenomai-core] Monotonic, realtime, and other timers

2007-06-26 Thread Jan Kiszka
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: IMO, the only advantage of having absolute timers is to be able to apply the posix scheme. So, if I followed correctly your discussion, what we need is: - an XNTBISOL flag with a service xntbase_isol which set this flag and unshare the target timebase if it is

Re: [Xenomai-core] Monotonic, realtime, and other timers

2007-06-26 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Jan Kiszka wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: IMO, the only advantage of having absolute timers is to be able to apply the posix scheme. So, if I followed correctly your discussion, what we need is: - an XNTBISOL flag with a service xntbase_isol which set this flag and unshare

Re: [Xenomai-core] Monotonic, realtime, and other timers

2007-06-26 Thread Philippe Gerum
On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 15:39 +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: IMO, the only advantage of having absolute timers is to be able to apply the posix scheme. So, if I followed correctly your discussion, what we need is: - an XNTBISOL flag with a service xntbase_isol which

Re: [Xenomai-core] Monotonic, realtime, and other timers

2007-06-26 Thread Jan Kiszka
Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: IMO, the only advantage of having absolute timers is to be able to apply the posix scheme. So, if I followed correctly your discussion, what we need is: - an XNTBISOL flag with a service xntbase_isol

[Xenomai-core] [PATCH] run aclocal first

2007-06-26 Thread Jan Kiszka
autoheader depends on aclocal output, so make the latter run first. (I was facing bootstrap failures due to different aclocal versions.) --- scripts/bootstrap | 20 ++-- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) Index: xenomai/scripts/bootstrap

Re: [Xenomai-core] Monotonic, realtime, and other timers

2007-06-26 Thread Gilles Chanteperdrix
Jan Kiszka wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: Jan Kiszka wrote: Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: IMO, the only advantage of having absolute timers is to be able to apply the posix scheme. So, if I followed correctly your discussion, what we need is: - an XNTBISOL