Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 07:50 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> currently, the situation is this:
>> - the timing core uses an approximate value of the cpu frequency (using
>> xnarch_llmulshft) to do conversions between tsc and ns;
>> - the APIC timer reprogramma
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 07:50 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Hi,
>
> currently, the situation is this:
> - the timing core uses an approximate value of the cpu frequency (using
> xnarch_llmulshft) to do conversions between tsc and ns;
> - the APIC timer reprogrammation still uses imuldiv, that
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 14:21 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 07:50 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> currently, the situation is this:
> >> - the timing core uses an approximate value of the cpu frequency (using
> >> xnarch_llm
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 14:21 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> Philippe Gerum wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 07:50 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
Hi,
currently, the situation is this:
- the timing core uses an approximate value of the cpu frequen
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 15:45 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Philippe Gerum wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 14:21 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> >> Philippe Gerum wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 07:50 +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Hi,
>
> currently, the situation