The patch works here too. Thanks for looking into this so quickly. I'll
switch back to 2.1 until this is resolved.
Vincent Levesque
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
> So could anyone test this patch and let me know if it works?
>
> Note : I haven't compiled it even as I don't have a proper
environment. But
> the changes are pretty simple so it should be ok.
I just did run the test program supplied by Vincent after applying
Your patch
(against 2.2.0)
It did work !
That's good. Thanks for your assistance.
So synch. message passing interface (IOW, rt_task_send/receive/reply)
is mgmglmgmm... slightly broken at the moment for all versions.
The ones who need it may use this patch so far. I'll think a bit more
on it in the mean time but I tend to think that "Fixed Ownership"
(expressed by XNSYNCH_FOWNER) should really be a property of the
synch. object indeed (as in the current patch).
> Only one small typo was in the patch, it is fixed in the attached patch
> version.
Ok, now I need to run diff -u old-patch new-patch to find out this typo :)
--
Best regards,
Dmitry Adamushko
_______________________________________________
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core
