Hi All,
I wanted to know if the latest Xenomai [Version xenomai-2.5.6] supports MSI
interrupts. I am using the adeos Patch [version adeos-ipipe-2.6.37-x86-2.9-00]
and corresponding Linux kernel [version: linux-2.6.37]. I have read in the
Xenomai FAQ that MSI is not supported by the ipipe patch
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:30:37 +0100
From: jan.kis...@siemens.com
To: gilles.chanteperd...@xenomai.org; krishnamurth...@hotmail.com
CC: xenomai-core@gna.org
Subject: Re: MSI support in Xenomai
On 2011-03-16 14:26, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
krishna m wrote:
Hi All, I wanted to know
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 13:13:16 +0100
From: jan.kis...@siemens.com
To: krishnamurth...@hotmail.com
CC: gilles.chanteperd...@xenomai.org; xenomai-core@gna.org
Subject: Re: MSI support in Xenomai
On 2011-03-21 13:48, krishna m wrote:
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:30:37 +0100
From: jan.kis
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 18:03:43 +0100
From: gilles.chanteperd...@xenomai.org
To: jan.kis...@siemens.com
CC: krishnamurth...@hotmail.com; xenomai-core@gna.org
Subject: Re: MSI support in Xenomai
Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-03-22 16:55, krishna m wrote:
Mar 22 21:12:47 localhost kernel
To: jan.kis...@siemens.com
CC: krishnamurth...@hotmail.com; xenomai-core@gna.org
Subject: Re: MSI support in Xenomai
Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-03-22 16:55, krishna m wrote:
Mar 22 21:12:47 localhost kernel: test_dev: Probe for device function=0
Mar 22 21:12:47 localhost kernel: test_dev
: Re: MSI support in Xenomai
Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-03-22 16:55, krishna m wrote:
Mar 22 21:12:47 localhost kernel: test_dev: Probe for device function=0
Mar 22 21:12:47 localhost kernel: test_dev :15:00.0: found PCI INT A
- IRQ 10
Here you get IRQ 10...
Mar 22 21:12:47
Has anyone tried applying Xenomai or RTAI patch to the tiny core Linux? Will it
give a better performance compared to the plain vanilla Linux because the
kernel footprint is small? ___
Xenomai-core mailing list
I ported the backfire tool in the OSADL site
[https://www.osadl.org/backfire-4.backfire.0.html] to measure the user to/from
kernel latency.I wanted to measure the difference between the RT_PREEMPT kernel
and Xenomai Kernel. Surprisingly i see RT_PREEMPT performance better than
Xenomai.
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 21:12:36 +0200
From: gilles.chanteperd...@xenomai.org
To: gm...@reliableembeddedsystems.com
CC: xenomai-core@gna.org
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] Tiny Core Linux + xenomai/RTAI
Robert Berger wrote:
Hi Gilles,
On 04/05/2011
