Thanks for the reply. Can you please tell me why my questions are useless. Such attitude will take Xenomai user group no where.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix < gilles.chanteperd...@xenomai.org> wrote: > krishna m wrote: > > I ported the backfire tool in the OSADL site [ > https://www.osadl.org/backfire-4.backfire.0.html] to measure the user > to/from kernel latency.I wanted to measure the difference between the > RT_PREEMPT kernel and Xenomai Kernel. Surprisingly i see RT_PREEMPT > performance better than Xenomai. > > > > Here are few points to note: > > 1. The thread priority of the "sendme" tool of backfire in RT_PREEMPT is > 99 [highest] > > 2. I have made the thread priority 99 for the rt_task that i spawn [par > of ported sendme] > > ret = rt_task_shadow(&rt_task_desc, NULL, 99, 0); > > > > My Questions: > > * I wanted to know if any one has done such measurements using backfire > and how dose Xenomai fair agnist RT_PREEMPT? > > * is there any similar tool like backfire in the Xenomai tool set that > dose the similar measurements? > > * Do I need to do more Xenomai specific optimization in the "sendme" and > "backfire" code to get better performance? > > Useless notes, useless questions. Show us the "ported" code. > > > -- > Gilles. > >
_______________________________________________ Xenomai-core mailing list Xenomai-core@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core
