Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hello,
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi,
this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA -
XN_ISR_EDGE), a few cleanups and updated comments.
Anders Blomdell wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hello,
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi,
this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA -
XN_ISR_EDGE), a few cleanups
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Anders Blomdell wrote:
My distinct feeling is that the return value should be a scalar and
not a set!
To sum up, the valid return values are HANDLED, HANDLED | ENABLE (*),
HANDLED | CHAINED and CHAINED. It's currently a set because I once
thought that the handled
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Anders Blomdell wrote:
My distinct feeling is that the return value should be a scalar and
not a set!
To sum up, the valid return values are HANDLED, HANDLED | ENABLE (*),
HANDLED | CHAINED and CHAINED. It's currently a set because I once
thought
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hello,
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi,
this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA -
XN_ISR_EDGE), a few cleanups and updated comments.
Anders Blomdell wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hello,
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi,
this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA -
XN_ISR_EDGE), a few cleanups
Anders Blomdell wrote:
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hello,
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi,
this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA -
XN_ISR_EDGE), a few cleanups
Philippe Gerum wrote:
Anders Blomdell wrote:
My distinct feeling is that the return value should be a scalar and
not a set!
To sum up, the valid return values are HANDLED, HANDLED | ENABLE (*),
HANDLED | CHAINED and CHAINED. It's currently a set because I once
thought that the handled
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hello,
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi,
this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA -
XN_ISR_EDGE), a few cleanups and updated comments.
On 08/02/06, Jan Kiszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still prefer configuration options as they also allow to reduce the overall code size (less cache refills and TLB misses). And shared
interrupts are for x86 only (approximately), I think. Unfortunately, IOk, that's a good argument. Then make
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hello,
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi,
this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA -
XN_ISR_EDGE), a few cleanups and updated comments.
Functionally, the support
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hello,
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi,
this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA -
XN_ISR_EDGE), a few cleanups and updated comments.
Functionally, the support for
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hello,
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi,
this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA -
XN_ISR_EDGE), a few cleanups and updated comments.
On 08/02/06, Jan Kiszka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still prefer configuration options as they also allow to reduce the overall code size (less cache refills and TLB misses). And shared
interrupts are for x86 only (approximately), I think. Unfortunately, IOk, that's a good argument. Then make
Hi,
this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA - XN_ISR_EDGE), a few cleanups and updated comments.
Functionally, the support for shared interrupts (a few flags) to the rtdm (Jan's patch) and native skin.
In
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hello,
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi,
this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA -
XN_ISR_EDGE), a few cleanups and updated comments.
Functionally, the support for shared
On 07/02/06, Wolfgang Grandegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, [skip-skip-skip] Happy testing ! :)My concern is code size. I see that the patches add substantial amountof code to the ISR. What about make this feature configurable?
Yes, I though about making the new stuff optionally
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hello,
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi,
this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA -
XN_ISR_EDGE), a few cleanups and updated comments.
Functionally, the support for
Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
Hello,
Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
Hi,
this is the final set of patches against the SVN trunk of 2006-02-03.
It addresses mostly remarks concerning naming (XN_ISR_ISA -
XN_ISR_EDGE), a few cleanups and updated comments.
Functionally, the support for shared
19 matches
Mail list logo
