[Xenomai-core] [PATCH] SMI-doc improvement / RTDM paper

2006-02-04 Thread Jan Kiszka
Hi Philippe,

this patch tries to clarify where to solve SMI-related latencies. Or
should we even mention the kconfig path?

Moreover, I would like to upload my RTL-Workshop paper about RTDM to
doc/nodist/pdf (~150k) so that it later makes it on the website as well. Ok?

Jan
Index: ksrc/arch/i386/smi.c
===
--- ksrc/arch/i386/smi.c	(Revision 539)
+++ ksrc/arch/i386/smi.c	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -209,8 +209,8 @@
 
 #else /* ! CONFIG_XENO_HW_SMI_WORKAROUND */
 
-printk(Xenomai: Intel chipset found and SMI workaround not enabled,\n
-  you may encounter high interrupt latencies.\n);
+printk(Xenomai: Intel chipset found but SMI workaround not enabled in kernel\n
+configuration. You may encounter high interrupt latencies.\n);
 pci_dev_put(dev);
 
 #endif /* ! CONFIG_XENO_HW_SMI_WORKAROUND */


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] SMI-doc improvement / RTDM paper

2006-02-04 Thread Hannes Mayer

Hi all!

Jan Kiszka wrote:
[...]

+printk(Xenomai: Intel chipset found but SMI workaround not enabled in 
kernel\n
+configuration. You may encounter high interrupt 
latencies.\n);


Speaking of printk. Since 2.1 I don't see any messages in the
kernel log. I bet there is a new switch somewhere, but I
can't find it. Any hint appreciated.

BTW, Jan, the SMI seems to be disabled now, even if I haven't
seen the message of disabling SMI in the klog.

Thanks  best regards,
Hannes.


___
Xenomai-core mailing list
Xenomai-core@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/xenomai-core


[Xenomai-core] [PATCH] SMI-doc improvement / RTDM paper

2006-02-04 Thread Jan Kiszka
Hi Philippe,

this patch tries to clarify where to solve SMI-related latencies. Or
should we even mention the kconfig path?

Moreover, I would like to upload my RTL-Workshop paper about RTDM to
doc/nodist/pdf (~150k) so that it later makes it on the website as well. Ok?

Jan
Index: ksrc/arch/i386/smi.c
===
--- ksrc/arch/i386/smi.c	(Revision 539)
+++ ksrc/arch/i386/smi.c	(Arbeitskopie)
@@ -209,8 +209,8 @@
 
 #else /* ! CONFIG_XENO_HW_SMI_WORKAROUND */
 
-printk(Xenomai: Intel chipset found and SMI workaround not enabled,\n
-  you may encounter high interrupt latencies.\n);
+printk(Xenomai: Intel chipset found but SMI workaround not enabled in kernel\n
+configuration. You may encounter high interrupt latencies.\n);
 pci_dev_put(dev);
 
 #endif /* ! CONFIG_XENO_HW_SMI_WORKAROUND */


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] SMI-doc improvement / RTDM paper

2006-02-04 Thread Hannes Mayer

Hi all!

Jan Kiszka wrote:
[...]

+printk(Xenomai: Intel chipset found but SMI workaround not enabled in 
kernel\n
+configuration. You may encounter high interrupt 
latencies.\n);


Speaking of printk. Since 2.1 I don't see any messages in the
kernel log. I bet there is a new switch somewhere, but I
can't find it. Any hint appreciated.

BTW, Jan, the SMI seems to be disabled now, even if I haven't
seen the message of disabling SMI in the klog.

Thanks  best regards,
Hannes.




Re: [Xenomai-core] [PATCH] SMI-doc improvement / RTDM paper

2006-02-04 Thread Hannes Mayer

Philippe Gerum wrote:
[...]

dmesg | grep -i xenomai: ?


Yeah, got it now!
Sorry for the silly question!

I forgot that as of 2.1 everything is compiled into the kernel
by default, so when running a testsuite example there are no
messages that xeno is loaded or unloaded.

Thanks and best regards,
Hannes.